Hi, Stefan
Thanks for your review. I've added CDDLv1.0 license and notice.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/branches/0.3/NOTICE.txt
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/branches/0.3/LICENSE.txt
Could you please check the files again?
Thanks.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:57
Hi Edward,
I found an issue which is a blocker IMO: jsp-2.1-6.1.4.jar and
jsp-api-2.1-6.1.4.jar from Jetty are included. To my knowlege they are
licensed under CDDL*. This is a "Category B" [4] license so either
- add the license [1] and the notice excerp [2] to the Hama LICENSE
and NOTICE files o
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Mohammad Islam wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The discussion about Oozie proposal is settling down. Therefore I would like
> to
> initiate a vote to accept Oozie as an Apache Incubator project.
>
> The latest proposal is pasted at the end and it could be
Currently I'd describe it as:
http://attic.apache.org/process.html
+
* Check copyright checkbox is signed off on.
** If not, then dig in to see if it can be signed off on.
*** If so, sign off with current date.
*** If not, remove source.
Hen
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Seems good.
Once said grease is applied, we should update the website to sign off
on copyright; then close down the podling.
Hen
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Craig L Russell
wrote:
> There is a grant on file (documents/grants/imsec-alois.pdf) from IMSEC GmbH
> for "ALOIS (code and all docume
Hi everyone,
The vote to retire Bluesky succeeds with only +1 votes from
Martijn, Emmanuel, Bernd, Niklas, Tommaso, Bertrand, Chris, Ralph,
Christian, Noel, Luciano, Alan, Upayavira, Ross, Benson, Craig, Greg,
William (binding)
and Andreas Kuckartz, Kalle Korhonen, Henry Saputra (non-binding).
Ple
+1 (binding)
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 7/5/11, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> From: Robert Burrell Donkin
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Deft to join the incubator
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Tuesday, July 5, 2011, 3:23 PM
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:35 AM,
> Niklas Gustavsson
> wrote:
Is there a list someplace of the steps to take to shutdown a project?On
the website, I see entry guides, podling guides, graduation guides, etc
but not a shutdown/termination guide.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend - http://www.talend.com
There are a bunch of +1 votes: (9 binding, 2 non-binding)
binding: dims, noel, gianugo, adc, kevan, tommaso, sanjiva, struberg, mnour
non-binding: kamaljit, bayard
And a +0 from prhodes
I'll start working on closing things down shortly.
Thanks!
Dan
On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 12:55:55
There is a grant on file (documents/grants/imsec-alois.pdf) from IMSEC
GmbH for "ALOIS (code and all documentation)" dated 4-Oct-2010.
This plus some elbow grease should allow a mentor to definitively
establish provenance of the code...
Craig
On Jul 5, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Christian Grobmeier
>> Do you have any tipps how I can make sure the source is covered by the
>> CLAs? As I understood we just have the initial import in SVN. All
>> committers have CLAs on file. Is that enough?
>
> It depends on who the copyright owners/licensees of the original
> import were. Identify that set, then
Friendly reminder - we still need one more +1 from a PMC for this release.
If somebody has the time to check it out, please feel free :-)
Thanks in advance!
Christian
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Ivan Habunek wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> It is my pleasure to announce the second release candidate
I have been on vacation since last week and missed this hot discussion.
I think BlueSky is a valuable project and the proposers/contributors
all have good intention to make the project successful here. I also
understand that due to the special way that the project operates
(short term students as
+1 to retire (non-binding).
What worries me is that Chen is talking about a 4th release while the
website doesn't record the Copyright or Verify distribution rights as
having been completed.
+1 (non-binding) to remove the source from SVN upon retirement due to
the Copyright action items not being
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi Hen,
>
>> To confirm, will you be doing the following steps:
>>
>> * Investigate whether the source was covered by CLAs.
>> * If so then update the web page before moving to retired.
>> * Otherwise delete the source from svn.
>
> Yes,
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [X ] +1 Accept Deft for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to Deft incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject Deft for incubation
(binding)
Robert
-
To unsu
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jul 5, 2011, at 3:35 AM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With three mentors graciously signed up and the discussion around the
> proposal settling, it's time for a vote on Deft joining the incubator.
>
> The latest proposal can be found below, or in the wiki:
>
On 7/5/2011 7:45 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I wasn't clear on the timing. They launched in Nov 2010 and have made
> one release. It will be 18 months in June of 2012. the question I was
> trying to explore was, 'how essential is it to have shown that they
> can attract and integrate new people b
No secret here. It's OpenNLP.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 5 July 2011 14:07, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Upayavira wrote:
...If a project, during an 18 month incub
On 5 July 2011 14:07, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>>> ...If a project, during an 18 month incubation, cannot draw in new blood,
>>> how can we believe that it will do so as a TLP?
>>>
>
Given the context you explained then I have to say I agree with both
Bertrand and Upayavira. On the other hand, I don't see any harm not
graduating from the Incubator and the project staying there for longer
time till the criteria of having more new blood into the project is
satisfied, and specific
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>> ...If a project, during an 18 month incubation, cannot draw in new blood,
>> how can we believe that it will do so as a TLP?
>>
>> Marketing of the project, getting it known, getting p
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> ...If a project, during an 18 month incubation, cannot draw in new blood,
> how can we believe that it will do so as a TLP?
>
> Marketing of the project, getting it known, getting people using it
> enough so as to draw in new blood, is clearly a p
I personally would say that bringing in new people is important. It is
an important part of showing your project to be viable, that it is
interesting enough to draw in new talent. Otherwise it is going to rely
permanently on the existing committers, which is not long term viable.
If a project, dur
I wasn't clear on the timing. They launched in Nov 2010 and have made
one release. It will be 18 months in June of 2012. the question I was
trying to explore was, 'how essential is it to have shown that they
can attract and integrate new people before hatching?' Your answer
seems to be 'not critica
On 7/5/2011 7:36 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
> Anyhow, what do other think? Should mentors be pushing early and often
> on this subject, or is it reasonable wait for, oh, 18 months and a few
> releases before getting pushy?
18 months and 'a few releases', with no obstacle but attracting more
co
This is the first incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts
being versioned as 0.1-incubating.
We are requesting a lazy consensus vote, as we have already received 3
binding IPMC +1 votes during the release voting on rave-dev -
Vote thread:
http://apache.markmail.org/message/vmgwtdou
I'm relatively new at mentoring, and I'm writing to solicit advice
from older hands on the early phases of community construction.
I'm looking at a podling with 7 initial contributors, running since
Nov 2010. No new contributors have been voted in, or even discussed.
Or even seen, I think, on the
On 7/5/11 12:35 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
[X] +1 Accept Deft for incubation (binding)
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additi
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Ashish wrote:
> [X] +1 Accept Deft for incubation
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> With three mentors graciously signed up and the discussion around the
>> proposal settling, it's time for a vote on Deft join
[X] +1 Accept Deft for incubation
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With three mentors graciously signed up and the discussion around the
> proposal settling, it's time for a vote on Deft joining the incubator.
>
> The latest proposal can be found below, or in the
Hi,
With three mentors graciously signed up and the discussion around the
proposal settling, it's time for a vote on Deft joining the incubator.
The latest proposal can be found below, or in the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DeftProposal
For discussions:
http://www.mail-archive.com/gen
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
wrote:
> Sorry to interrupt this technical discussion, but I believe that now
> we are ready to go for a [VOTE] ?
Agreed. I'll start a new thread.
/niklas
-
To unsubscribe,
On 7/5/11 12:12 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Sorry to interrupt this technical discussion, but I believe that now
we are ready to go for a [VOTE] ?
Was thinking the same...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
Sorry to interrupt this technical discussion, but I believe that now
we are ready to go for a [VOTE] ?
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Roger Schildmeijer
wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Been examining the asyncweb project in more details (atleast the
> asyncweb.client and asyncwebserver components). Belo
35 matches
Mail list logo
