If the code was developed in part by HP employees "on the clock" then
a CCLA or SGA must be obtained from HP.
If the code was developed in part by others, then those other persons
need to sign a SGA covering their contributions.
All the current developers need to sign an ICLA.
If any of th
Well, this is going to depend on how the copyrights work, I guess. If
it's clear that HP owns the copyright (all the HP people were working
for hire), then a CCLA from HP will cover it. However, IANTL.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ge
On 27/11/10 13:34, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
I tend to agree with Craig in this particular case, as HP owns the
code to Jena and it's HP employes, covered by a CCLA, who are going to
commit it.
I dont' think this makes a material difference to this discussion, but
for clarity the committers are
Hi Benson,
I have no problem with your clarifying the page.
Regards,
Craig
On Nov 27, 2010, at 4:35 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Craig,
Would you recommend that I edit the mentor page on the site with this
clarification, or should we wait for more polyphony?
Thanks,
benson
On Fri, Nov 26,
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Craig,
>
> Would you recommend that I edit the mentor page on the site with this
> clarification, or should we wait for more polyphony?
I tend to agree with Craig in this particular case, as HP owns the
code to Jena and it's HP employes,
Craig,
Would you recommend that I edit the mentor page on the site with this
clarification, or should we wait for more polyphony?
Thanks,
benson
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Craig L Russell
wrote:
> Hi Benson,
>
> I think of a CCLA as a combination of an SGA to cover the software grant
>
