Craig, Would you recommend that I edit the mentor page on the site with this clarification, or should we wait for more polyphony?
Thanks, benson On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Craig L Russell <craig.russ...@oracle.com>wrote: > Hi Benson, > > I think of a CCLA as a combination of an SGA to cover the software grant > plus an acknowledgement that people in the company are going to work on > Apache projects, whether on their own time or company time. > > So, if a CCLA is filed naming the software, a separate SGA is *not* > necessary. > > Craig > > > On Nov 26, 2010, at 10:48 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > > I can't find anything in [1] that states any conditions in which a >> CCLA won't do and an SGA is required instead. >> >> The Jena podling has asked me. Their situation is that an HP copyright >> is thought to cover all the 'corporate' code, and they wonder if there >> is any reason for them to chase an SGA on top of the CCLA that they >> will need anyhow. >> >> 1: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-clearance >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> > Craig L Russell > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation > Chair, OpenJPA PMC > c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
