Re: Shindig PMC sponsorship for Amber OAuth java library

On 29/04/2010 23:43, David Jencks wrote: > I'm interested in implementing jaspic (jsr 196) support if practical. > This should allow Amber to provide container managed authentication in any > jaspic enabled servlet container. I'm not familiar enough with OAuth to know > if it makes sense to ha

Re: Shindig PMC sponsorship for Amber OAuth java library

I'm interested in implementing jaspic (jsr 196) support if practical. This should allow Amber to provide container managed authentication in any jaspic enabled servlet container. I'm not familiar enough with OAuth to know if it makes sense to have a client auth module but surely a server auth

Re: Shindig PMC sponsorship for Amber OAuth java library

Paul, I've already added myself to the initial committers. I'll send the fax later today. Thanks On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Paul Lindner wrote: > Hi Pablo, > > If you are considering merging Scribe with Amber I would add yourself to > the > initial committers list, and fax in an ICLA to

Re: Shindig PMC sponsorship for Amber OAuth java library

Hi Pablo, If you are considering merging Scribe with Amber I would add yourself to the initial committers list, and fax in an ICLA to get things rolling: http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:07 AM, pablo fernandez < fernandezp

Re: Shindig PMC sponsorship for Amber OAuth java library

Simone, Yeah, the library now supports OAuth v1.0a. I intend to add 2.0 support eventually... I added myself under "other interested people". I've never participated in any apache project so I think that's the right place. Thanks On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Simone Gianni wrote: > Hi Pabl

Re: [PROPOSAL] Whirr Project

Patrick, That sounds great - thanks for volunteering. I've added you to the initial committer list on the proposal page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WhirrProposal. Steve Loughran has volunteered to be a mentor; I've added his name too. I would like to send a vote on this proposal to the I

Re: [DISCUSS] Amber proposal

Hi Daniel, we're planning to develop a library usable by other projects, for v1 and 1a of OAuth, and then start from that first deliverable to work on an implementation of v2. From what I understand the scope of the GSoC project is already quite well delineated, however maybe the student could cont

Re: Shindig PMC sponsorship for Amber OAuth java library

Hi Pablo, great, thanks for your interest. I suppose you are talking about OAuth v1? Please have a look at the current proposal on http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AmberProposal and eventually add yourself where appropriate. Simone 2010/4/29 pablo fernandez > Hello Everyone! > > I've developed

Re: Shindig PMC sponsorship for Amber OAuth java library

Hello Everyone! I've developed a OAuth library for java that it's working pretty well, although it's still work in progress. I'd be glad to collaborate the code to Amber, modifying it to the project needs. If you want to take a look at it, please go to: github.com/fernandezpablo85/scribe

Re: [DISCUSS] Amber proposal

Interesting. For CXF, we now have a Google Summer of Code project to add OAuth support to CXF. I'll have to point him off to this to see if there is a way to work together. Dan On Tuesday 27 April 2010 10:32:04 am Simone Gianni wrote: > Hi all, > a couple of months ago, Simone Tripodi st

Re: Shindig PMC sponsorship for Amber OAuth java library

On 29/04/2010 10:45, Paul Lindner wrote: > The Shindig PMC has approved the proposal to sponsor the Amber project for > the Apache Incubator. > > 7 +1 votes were submitted. [Henning, Chirag, Chico, Paul, Jacky, Santiago > and Vincent] > No 0 or -1 votes. That's excellent news! Thanks. Pid > O

Shindig PMC sponsorship for Amber OAuth java library

The Shindig PMC has approved the proposal to sponsor the Amber project for the Apache Incubator. 7 +1 votes were submitted. [Henning, Chirag, Chico, Paul, Jacky, Santiago and Vincent] No 0 or -1 votes. Thanks Paul On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Paul Lindner wrote: > Hi, > > I propose that th