On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> please find below our proposal for Zeta Components. The proposal is also
> available in the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ZetaComponentsProposal
Sorry that
+1 from me (non-binding).
Sounds awesome!
Cheers,
Chris
On 4/19/10 6:52 AM, "Tobias Schlitt" wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
please find below our proposal for Zeta Components. The proposal is also
available in the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator
On 19 Apr 2010, at 06:52, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> please find below our proposal for Zeta Components. The proposal is also
> available in the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ZetaComponentsProposal
Well done!
+1 (Non Binding)
Cheers
Jan
--
>
> Regards,
> Toby
>
> ==
> would it be possible to package a SVN-export as a tarball for example,
> and transfer this?
> Loosing the information stored in the 11.5k changesets / commit messages
> would hurt a project of this size quite a bit.
Ask infra if we can import your full history.
--- Noel
> Note that most of the "signed off by mentor" lines present at
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2010 are missing from the below
> report.
Always. While those sign-offs are of interest to the Incubator PMC, and I
check them as I prepare the monthly report, my view is that the report
subm
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Kore Nordmann wrote:
> The IP clearance form [1] defines that the code is transferred using a
> "canocical tarball". Does that mean, we will loose the full version
> history for the project? Or would it be possible to package a SVN-export
> as a tarball for exampl
On 04/20/2010 01:44 AM, David Crossley wrote:
Ate Douma wrote:
What exactly is the "standard" procedure for a terminated podling, I can't
really find anything on that on the incubator website.
There ain't no exactlies.
Searching for the term "Retire" has better results. However as far
as i r
Dear remaining WSRP4J community,
The Apache Incubator voted and accepted the Portals PMC proposal to terminate
the WSRP4J project.
The WSRP4J incubator project status has been updated accordingly, see:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/wsrp4j.html
Furthermore, the subversion tree of WSRP4J
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks,
Senaka.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> please find below our proposal for Zeta Components. The proposal is also
> available in the wiki:
>
>http://wiki.apache.org/incubato
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Richard Hirsch wrote:
> ...you may be interested to know that is already a Scala-based Apache
> incubator
> project: http://incubator.apache.org/esme/ ...
and a Scala scripting engine in Sling:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sling/trunk/contrib/scripting/scala/
Hi Richard,
thanks for the Info, I'll try to take a look at it.
Bye,
Sandro
2010/4/20, Richard Hirsch :
> Hi Sandro,
>
> you may be interested to know that is already a Scala-based Apache incubator
> project: http://incubator.apache.org/esme/
>
> Regards,
>
> Dick
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 3:5
Hi Sandro,
you may be interested to know that is already a Scala-based Apache incubator
project: http://incubator.apache.org/esme/
Regards,
Dick
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Sandro Martini wrote:
> Hi Bertrand,
> thank you very much for the Help.
>
> I find Scala very (complex but) excitin
Hi Bertrand,
thank you very much for the Help.
I find Scala very (complex but) exciting, so start some experiments in
Apache with Scala could be really a good thing, for both communities.
Bye,
Sandro
2010/4/16, Bertrand Delacretaz :
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Sandro Martini
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have one question regarding the code import.
The IP clearance form [1] defines that the code is transferred using a
"canocical tarball". Does that mean, we will loose the full version
history for the project? Or would it be possible to package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/04/10 15:11, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>>> I don't think this should be an incubation blocker, although some of us
>>> have really strong feelings against Jira and even stronger ag
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
>> I don't think this should be an incubation blocker, although some of us
>> have really strong feelings against Jira and even stronger against
>> Bugzilla. Therefore, if we can sort out this stuff before, it's good. :)
>
> I wrote the i
> I don't think this should be an incubation blocker, although some of us
> have really strong feelings against Jira and even stronger against
> Bugzilla. Therefore, if we can sort out this stuff before, it's good. :)
I wrote the infra team an e-mail, lets see what they answer
Christian
>
> Rega
Hello Incubator team:
A quick heads-up that those projects preparing to graduate from the Incubator
have an opportunity to issue a press release or related statement (such as a
blog post) aimed at members of the media and analyst community.
Those who are interested in taking advantage of this c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/20/2010 02:48 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> would it be problematic if issue tracking / CI would be hosted on a
>> dedicated server outside Apache? Kore Nordmann and me would happily
>> sponsor this server.
> I am not a decision maker, but I
> would it be problematic if issue tracking / CI would be hosted on a
> dedicated server outside Apache? Kore Nordmann and me would happily
> sponsor this server.
I am not a decision maker, but I would think that CI is no problem. I
mean, it uses code from Apache SVN and there is no documentation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 04/20/2010 01:34 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> I think the complete project should be hosted on apache servers
>> Is it possible to use Arbit instead of the standard issue trackers
>> provided by Apache?
> Currently only bugzilla and jir
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Currently only bugzilla and jira is used in apache world. The use of
> Arbit needs to be discussed with the infra team. I am not sure if this
> will happen so easily
>
> For integration, there are several continuus integration serv
>> I think the complete project should be hosted on apache servers
>
> we would be happy to host our infrastructure on Apache servers.
> Especially for SVN and the mailinglists.
SVN and mailinglists should be no problem, this is standard for most projects.
> Is it possible to use Arbit instead of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Christian,
On 04/20/2010 01:14 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> An excellent well thought out, complete proposal, with none of the usual
>> copying
>> of previous proposals with a bit of tweaking.
> Just one note:
>>> Required Resources
>>> The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bertrand,
On 04/20/2010 01:16 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Erik Abele wrote:
>> On Apr 19, 2010, at 15:52, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ZetaComponentsProposal
>> +1!
>>
>>
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Erik Abele wrote:
> > On Apr 19, 2010, at 15:52, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> >>...
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ZetaComponentsProposal
> >
> > +1!
> >
> > Yeah, I know it's long but any other opinions?
>
+1 (Not binding)
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
>> Being mostly clueless about PHP I'm curious about how such modules
>> would be released. Does the usual model of a downloadable archive that
>> includes NOTICE/LICENSE files apply, or would Zeta components mostly
>> b
> Being mostly clueless about PHP I'm curious about how such modules
> would be released. Does the usual model of a downloadable archive that
> includes NOTICE/LICENSE files apply, or would Zeta components mostly
> be released through a module distribution server like
> http://pear.php.net/ ?
I th
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
>>> ...However, for reliability
>>> reasons, there are some services which we would want to have hosted by
>>> the ASF.
>
> I think the complete project should be hosted on apache servers
Agree, I missed that but yes all the required inf
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Erik Abele wrote:
> On Apr 19, 2010, at 15:52, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
>>...
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ZetaComponentsProposal
>
> +1!
>
> Yeah, I know it's long but any other opinions?
Just finished reading it, big +1, cool to see more php stuff at A
> An excellent well thought out, complete proposal, with none of the usual
> copying
> of previous proposals with a bit of tweaking.
Just one note:
>> Required Resources
>> The current project infrastructure is hosted by eZ Systems, but this
>> should change. The project can be fully hosted on i
An excellent well thought out, complete proposal, with none of the usual copying
of previous proposals with a bit of tweaking.
All looks good to me.
Gav...
> -Original Message-
> From: Tobias Schlitt [mailto:tob...@schlitt.info]
> Sent: Monday, 19 April 2010 11:53 PM
> To: general@incub
On Apr 19, 2010, at 15:52, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> please find below our proposal for Zeta Components. The proposal is also
> available in the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ZetaComponentsProposal
+1!
Yeah, I kn
Hi,
a big, big, big +1 from my side. I am not on the IPMC, so its
non-binding. But I highly appreciate this move.
Log4PHP could also benefit from Zeta (or vice versa). Shindig also
does have PHP stuff in it and could benefit too.
Also, I wrote a web framework in the past which could be put on to
34 matches
Mail list logo
