On Nov 17, 2009, at 8:40 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
> wrote:
>
>> As Hyrum suggests, we can use org.apache.subversion.* if we want to
>> create a new (better) Java interface within our versioning rules - but
>> that isn't necessary nor should
On 18/11/2009, at 3:40 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
> wrote:
>
>> As Hyrum suggests, we can use org.apache.subversion.* if we want to
>> create a new (better) Java interface within our versioning rules - but
>> that isn't necessary nor should i
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Todd Volkert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the
> "Apache Pivot" top-level project.
>
> Please place your votes within the next 72 hours -- to serve as
> recommendations to the Board at the December Board mee
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
wrote:
> As Hyrum suggests, we can use org.apache.subversion.* if we want to
> create a new (better) Java interface within our versioning rules - but
> that isn't necessary nor should it be a pre-req for graduation.
IMNSHO, either Subversion ad
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:28 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> David Crossley wrote:
>> > Branko ??ibej wrote:
>> >> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> >> > I ran a RAT report (0.6 version) ?on subversion trunk but theres alot
>> >> > of *noise* from it. I have opened a bug ticket for
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> Is there any way to make RAT slightly smarter so that it doesn't require
>> license headers in README files and such?
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/main/trunk/
>
On Nov 17, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Todd Volkert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the
> "Apache Pivot" top-level project.
>
> Please place your votes within the next 72 hours -- to serve as
> recommendations to the Board at the December Board meet
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > Branko ??ibej wrote:
> >> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> >> > I ran a RAT report (0.6 version) ?on subversion trunk but theres alot
> >> > of *noise* from it. I have opened a bug ticket for license header
> >> > review here:
> >> >
> >> > http://subversi
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:01 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> Branko ??ibej wrote:
>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> > I ran a RAT report (0.6 version) on subversion trunk but theres alot
>> > of *noise* from it. I have opened a bug ticket for license header
>> > review here:
>> >
>> > http://subversion.t
Branko ??ibej wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > I ran a RAT report (0.6 version) on subversion trunk but theres alot
> > of *noise* from it. I have opened a bug ticket for license header
> > review here:
> >
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3529
>
> Very helpful, thanks.
+1
Niall
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Todd Volkert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the
> "Apache Pivot" top-level project.
>
> Please place your votes within the next 72 hours -- to serve as
> recommendations to the Board at the Decembe
Hi,
[x] +1, Graduate Apache Pivot
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> [X ] +1, Graduate Apache Pivot
Congrats!
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Todd Volkert wrote:
>> The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the
>> "Apache Pivot" top-level project.
>
> +1 from me!
>
> cheers,
>
> Leo
>
>
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Todd Volkert wrote:
> The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the
> "Apache Pivot" top-level project.
+1 from me!
cheers,
Leo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubs
Hi all,
The Apache Pivot community feels that it is ready to graduate into the
"Apache Pivot" top-level project.
Please place your votes within the next 72 hours -- to serve as
recommendations to the Board at the December Board meeting.
[ ] +1, Graduate Apache Pivot
[ ] 0, I don't care
[ ] -1, A
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Is there any way to make RAT slightly smarter so that it doesn't require
> license headers in README files and such?
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rat/main/trunk/
*duck*
> Does policy dictate these
> files must have license head
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> There is a more practical reason for this. If I have a need to debug a
> package or get further documentation, the package name gives me a pointer as
> to where to look. If tigris.org disappeared users would get very confused.
>
> IMO, whethe
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> I ran a RAT report (0.6 version) on subversion trunk but theres alot
> of *noise* from it. I have opened a bug ticket for license header
> review here:
>
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3529
>
Very helpful, thanks.
> It would make review easier i
On Nov 17, 2009, at 6:27 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>
> On Nov 17, 2009, at 3:11 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> Ralph Goers wrote:
>>> In general, Java code at Apache should reside under a package of
>>> org.apache. In this case, I would expect org.apache.subversion.javahl. Of
>>> course, this
On Nov 17, 2009, at 1:25 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
> Java coding standard(s) makes very strong assertions that package
> names should be 'owned' domain names, to ensure avoidance of name
> collisions. Apache has maintained such for practically all projects,
> incl all incoming projects, and I a
On Nov 17, 2009, at 3:11 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Ralph Goers wrote:
>> In general, Java code at Apache should reside under a package of org.apache.
>> In this case, I would expect org.apache.subversion.javahl. Of course, this
>> will create compatibility problems. I don't know if it is compl
Gaël Lalire wrote:
Hello,
Hi !
Today if you want to do syntax analysis, you have to use a compiler of compiler
(bison, yacc, javaCC ...) which generates source code.
After generation, you need to compile your generated source code and then you
can parse some input.
I dislike this method b
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> "Must" is just a result of what our API versioning policy promises to
> our users. Any number of compatibility layers won't change that.
Yes, but your versioning policy for sure allows incompatible changes
thru some mechanism, typically majo
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>
>> I don't quite understand the point of this. Here we are with a Java
>> wrapper library for the Subversion APIs. The versioning rules that apply
>> to it are the same as for the rest of Subversion -- in other wor
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> I don't quite understand the point of this. Here we are with a Java
> wrapper library for the Subversion APIs. The versioning rules that apply
> to it are the same as for the rest of Subversion -- in other words, we
> *must* keep the same pac
Hi David;
I learn new rules/things every day :)
Thanks for poking. I am going to change it in the evening
--Gurkan
2009/11/17 David Crossley
> The OpenWebBeans Status page links directly to apache.org /dist
>
> Please see the ASF mirror guidelines, which emphatically say
> to use the mirrors.
Ralph Goers wrote:
> In general, Java code at Apache should reside under a package of org.apache.
> In this case, I would expect org.apache.subversion.javahl. Of course, this
> will create compatibility problems. I don't know if it is completely possible
> to create a separate jar containing th
28 matches
Mail list logo
