Branko ??ibej wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > I ran a RAT report (0.6 version) on subversion trunk but theres alot > > of *noise* from it. I have opened a bug ticket for license header > > review here: > > > > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3529 > > Very helpful, thanks. > > > It would make review easier if the files without headers had them > > added. If thats considered a good idea, I'll try and help submitting > > patches. > > Is there any way to make RAT slightly smarter so that it doesn't require > license headers in README files and such? Does policy dictate these > files must have license headers, too?
We have been using an "excludes" file to run RAT over Forrest, driven by the Ant task, using both Buildbot and Gump. I explained it today to rat-dev, so that should help you to get started. -David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
