On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
>
>>>
>>> I have uploaded the Apache Stonehenge M1 release artifacts here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/take3/
>>
>> Sigs and hashes OK.
>> Binary tgz and zip archives agree with each other.
>
Hi Sebb,
>>
>> I have uploaded the Apache Stonehenge M1 release artifacts here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~shankar/stonehenge/m1/take3/
>
> Sigs and hashes OK.
> Binary tgz and zip archives agree with each other.
> Source tgz and zip archives agree with each other.
>
> N&L files appear to be
On 21/05/2009, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Apache Stonehenge community has voted for the M1 release of Apache
> Stonehenge. We are now asking the approval from the Incubator PMC to
> publish the release.
>
> Stonehenge is a set of example applications for Service Oriented
>
On May 15, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
Dear Incubator PMC Members,
The Wink team would like to officially present the proposal for the
Wink
REST runtime for incubation in the Apache Incubator. This proposal
has
been surfaced previously and is also available at:
http://
+1
- Deepal
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Apache Stonehenge community has voted for the M1 release of Apache
> Stonehenge. We are now asking the approval from the Incubator PMC to
> publish the release.
>
> Stonehenge is a set of example applic
Hi,
The Apache Stonehenge community has voted for the M1 release of Apache
Stonehenge. We are now asking the approval from the Incubator PMC to
publish the release.
Stonehenge is a set of example applications for Service Oriented
Architecture that spans languages and platforms and demonstrates be
I am a mentor for Shindig, but I am aware of a weaknesses of mine as a
mentor is that I'm not that knowledgeable or experienced with the
release process at Apache, and therefore have not followed this thread
in detail, which I really should have.
It seems that this release is stalled, but I am not
My recollection of the discussion was that the recommendations where
a) don't ask the party that might be infringed on for permission, b)
it is OK to wait for the project to wait until they are contacted, if
ever, before doing anything. Ironically, shortly before this
discussion there was a
