On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> As described in [1], please acknowledge this request to enter the
> Apache Chemistry project into incubation. The Jackrabbit PMC has voted
> [2] to approve the Chemistry project (see
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChemistryProposal) for
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Gavin wrote:
> If your still willing, can I add you in as a Mentor ?
Yes, on the basis that I mentioned; A non-technical Mentor, as I have
zero or less PHP experience and don't intend to get any...
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.o
> -Original Message-
> From: Gavin [mailto:ga...@16degrees.com.au]
> Sent: Monday, 27 April 2009 2:46 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Getting Log4PHP going again.
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: hedh...@gmail.com [mailto:hedh...@gmail.com] On Behalf
> -Original Message-
> From: hedh...@gmail.com [mailto:hedh...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Niclas
> Hedhman
> Sent: Sunday, 22 March 2009 2:38 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Getting Log4PHP going again.
>
>
> I am not a PHP guy at all, but AFAIUI (only from the packag
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Vincent Siveton
wrote:
> You need to do a checkout of the tag to build it.
> The source artifacts provide only java source, no build file.
-1.
As others have pointed out, the ASF releases Open SOURCE, not Open
Binaries and part of the policy is that the distribu
On 27/04/2009, Chris Chabot wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:36 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> >
> > The *php* archive also has the COPYING and COMMITTERS files. The
> > NOTICE file says 2008.
>
>
>
> Those files are from the same source as the java archive, so when the new
> archives are created the
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:36 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> The *php* archive also has the COPYING and COMMITTERS files. The
> NOTICE file says 2008.
Those files are from the same source as the java archive, so when the new
archives are created they will be updated too.
>
> Not sure the .htaccess file
On 26/04/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> > 2009/4/26 sebb :
> >
> > > On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> > >> 2009/4/26 Henning Schmiedehausen :
> > >>
> > >> > Sorry, to bother you here, but I don't believe, that you have a
> choice.
> > >>
> > >>
On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> 2009/4/26 Jukka Zitting :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Vincent Siveton
> > wrote:
> >> 2009/4/26 Jukka Zitting :
> >>> How do I build this to produce the binaries you've deployed?
> >>
> >> mvn install -Prelease
> >
> > I can'
2009/4/26 sebb :
> I think there are some problems with the archives.
>
> The *java* archive contains a .war file which has 42 jars in the
> WEB-INF/lib directory.
>
> Some 17 or so of these are ASF files, but the rest are 3rd party files.
> None of the 3rd party files are mentioned in the META-INF
On 26/04/2009, sebb wrote:
> I think there are some problems with the archives.
>
> The *java* archive contains a .war file which has 42 jars in the
> WEB-INF/lib directory.
>
> Some 17 or so of these are ASF files, but the rest are 3rd party files.
> None of the 3rd party files are mentioned
On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> 2009/4/26 sebb :
>
> > On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> >> 2009/4/26 Henning Schmiedehausen :
> >>
> >> > Sorry, to bother you here, but I don't believe, that you have a choice.
> >>
> >>
> >> We provided both java and php source code.
> >>
>
2009/4/26 Jukka Zitting :
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Vincent Siveton
> wrote:
>> 2009/4/26 Jukka Zitting :
>>> How do I build this to produce the binaries you've deployed?
>>
>> mvn install -Prelease
>
> I can't, as there's no pom.xml in the source archive.
You need to do a check
I think there are some problems with the archives.
The *java* archive contains a .war file which has 42 jars in the
WEB-INF/lib directory.
Some 17 or so of these are ASF files, but the rest are 3rd party files.
None of the 3rd party files are mentioned in the META-INF NOTICE and
LICENSE files.
Ye
2009/4/26 sebb :
> On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton wrote:
>> 2009/4/26 Henning Schmiedehausen :
>>
>> > Sorry, to bother you here, but I don't believe, that you have a choice.
>>
>>
>> We provided both java and php source code.
>>
>> Java artifacts are given via the Maven repo as usual, ie [1]
>
>
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Vincent Siveton
wrote:
> 2009/4/26 Jukka Zitting :
>> How do I build this to produce the binaries you've deployed?
>
> mvn install -Prelease
I can't, as there's no pom.xml in the source archive.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
--
On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> 2009/4/26 Henning Schmiedehausen :
>
> > Sorry, to bother you here, but I don't believe, that you have a choice.
>
>
> We provided both java and php source code.
>
> Java artifacts are given via the Maven repo as usual, ie [1]
This is not usual; all other
Hi,
As described in [1], please acknowledge this request to enter the
Apache Chemistry project into incubation. The Jackrabbit PMC has voted
[2] to approve the Chemistry project (see
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ChemistryProposal) for incubation.
The nominated mentors of the project are:
Hi,
2009/4/26 Jukka Zitting :
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Vincent Siveton
> wrote:
>> We provided both java and php source code.
>>
>> Java artifacts are given via the Maven repo as usual, ie [1]
>> [...]
>> [1] http://tinyurl.com/cejp5x
>
> How do I build this to produce the bina
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Vincent Siveton
wrote:
> We provided both java and php source code.
>
> Java artifacts are given via the Maven repo as usual, ie [1]
> [...]
> [1] http://tinyurl.com/cejp5x
How do I build this to produce the binaries you've deployed?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
---
2009/4/26 Henning Schmiedehausen :
> Sorry, to bother you here, but I don't believe, that you have a choice.
We provided both java and php source code.
Java artifacts are given via the Maven repo as usual, ie [1]
For PHP, according Chris [2], the binary is the source and visa versa.
Is it more c
Hi Brian,
2009/4/26 BRIAN FOX :
>>
>> Why are there two binary release directories?
>>
>> The 017 one only seems to have one archive (.bz2) in it, the rest of
>> the files are hashes or signatures (and even some hashes of sigs,
>> which could be safely deleted, as they serve no purpose)
>>
>
> Vin
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Vincent Siveton
wrote:
> 2009/4/26 sebb :
>> Where are the source archive files?
>
> The community decided to not provide full source archived files.
Then you have no release and this whole vote thread is void.
See http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#wha
2009/4/26 sebb :
> The RAT report on SVN reports 476 files with unknown licences.
> Some of these may be test files (though even these should have AL if
> poss), but there seem to be quite a few files that should have the AL
> header, e.g. pom.xml etc.
Ok I saw the pom.xml in features and some js
Sorry, to bother you here, but I don't believe, that you have a choice.
An Apache releases consists of source code. Binary artifacts are just an
"add on bonus". I can ping Roy on that subject if you beg to
differ. ;-)
However, as (at least for the Java part), all source code is available
as sour
Hi Sebb,
2009/4/26 sebb :
> Why are there two binary release directories?
My provider changed my IP during the release process, but no maven errors.
> The 017 one only seems to have one archive (.bz2) in it, the rest of
> the files are hashes or signatures (and even some hashes of sigs,
> which
I have no idea what that means and how it relates to a ASF release
candidate. Care to elaborate?
Sebb's question is valid: There are two directories with similar named
artifacts.
Ciao
Henning
On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 10:17 -0400, BRIAN FOX wrote:
> >
> > Why are there two b
Why are there two binary release directories?
The 017 one only seems to have one archive (.bz2) in it, the rest of
the files are hashes or signatures (and even some hashes of sigs,
which could be safely deleted, as they serve no purpose)
Vincent, if you do multiple mvn builds that should go i
On 26/04/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
> > Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
> > Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
> > of the backend APIs and p
On 26/04/2009, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
> Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
> Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
> of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
> applicat
Hi,
Please review and vote on approving the first release of Apache
Shindig version 1.0-incubating.
Apache Incubator Shindig is a JavaScript container and implementations
of the backend APIs and proxy required for hosting OpenSocial
applications.
Vote thread:
http://markmail.org/message/4blgcaxyk
Hi
HP started developing the REST SDK about 2.5 yeas ago, at that time there was
no suitable REST framework that provided the capabilities we were looking for.
When decided to join forces with IBM and go open source, the SDK already
existed, so the question was where shell we publish it, rewritin
32 matches
Mail list logo
