On 16/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam wrote:
> Thank you very much for your very prompt review.
> Answers to your questions below.
>
> Shanti
>
> sebb wrote:
>
> > The OlioDriver.jar file contains a smaller OlioDriver.jar file.
> > This is very confusing; one of the jars should be renamed.
> >
> >
Thank you very much for your very prompt review.
Answers to your questions below.
Shanti
sebb wrote:
The OlioDriver.jar file contains a smaller OlioDriver.jar file.
This is very confusing; one of the jars should be renamed.
This is the format of the Faban (http://faban.sunsource.net) Driver
On 15/04/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 15/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE wrote:
> > Here is some additional information :
> >
> > . The following people have cast their Vote in favor of this release:
> >
> > - Committers; Akara Sucharitakul, William Sobel, Sheetal Patel,
> > Shanti Subraman
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Seems like perfect timing :)
>
> We just discussed our options last week in the Sanselan project. As
> Craig already summarized this, Sanselan has these options: graduate into
> commons (incubator), indefinite incubation, expulsion from Ap
On 15/04/2009, Shanti Subramanyam - PAE wrote:
> Here is some additional information :
>
> . The following people have cast their Vote in favor of this release:
>
> - Committers; Akara Sucharitakul, William Sobel, Sheetal Patel,
> Shanti Subramanyam
> - Additional users/developers: Amanda Wa
> "System Requirement" means that it must be present on the user's
> system before you can build and/or execute the program.
>
> So, the build system should locate the plugin.jar via the JDK location
> and platform it is running, and the runtime should do the same and
> make it part of the classpat
Here is some additional information :
. The following people have cast their Vote in favor of this release:
- Committers; Akara Sucharitakul, William Sobel, Sheetal Patel,
Shanti Subramanyam
- Additional users/developers: Amanda Waite,
- Mentors: Craig Russell
. Craig has reviewed the lic
The Olio community has voted and approved this first binary release of
Olio. We are now asking for a Vote of the Incubator PMC to publish this
release.
The release includes both the PHP and Rails versions of Olio.
The release artificats and RAT reports are available here :
http://people.apache
I'll apologize in advance because I will probably sound like a total dick in
this email being that I'm irritated for unrelated reasons at the moment. Now
I'll attempt to steer this beast of a thread back on course while it's still
possible to do so:
--- On Wed, 4/15/09, Jochen Wiedmann wrote
On 15/04/2009, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> Two comments:
>
> (1) A Commons Incubator in the form put forth in the incubation proposal of
> the same name does not seem likely to happen, given the feedback on this list
> so far.
>
> (2) If Commons would accept Sanselan, it having already been throug
Two comments:
(1) A Commons Incubator in the form put forth in the incubation proposal of the
same name does not seem likely to happen, given the feedback on this list so
far.
(2) If Commons would accept Sanselan, it having already been through the
incubator would graduate as a proper, or pos
Seems like perfect timing :)
We just discussed our options last week in the Sanselan project. As
Craig already summarized this, Sanselan has these options: graduate into
commons (incubator), indefinite incubation, expulsion from Apache or
incorporation into another TLP. Of course in theory it coul
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
> wrote:
>
>> Commons is working *now*. Just as Jakarta was working once. But
>> Commons will most likely no longer work when it is growing too much.
>> And the things discussed here (making
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> Commons is working *now*. Just as Jakarta was working once. But
> Commons will most likely no longer work when it is growing too much.
> And the things discussed here (making Commons the target of many new
> subprojects, which aren't integ
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Todd Volkert wrote:
> This is incredibly frustrating, because 13 days ago, we discussed this JAR
> specifically, and Niclas wrote "Looks to me that it is part of the JDK/JRE,
> and is Ok as system requirement, even if the license is something else." (
> http://tin
15 matches
Mail list logo
