Hello, Bernd,
Thanks for a quick answer.
Well, we do have a working code base, that's correct. I might perceive
things as too complex having concerns about a gap between working code
and the code which can be committed to the Apache subversion. Our code
might (and likely was) tainted by cut&paste
Hi David,
I have seen OpenDeploy website, and it's right that the name is already used
ever
if the tool purpose is not exactly the same as AutoDeploy (ones again, the scope
is not exactly the same).
You know, before starting AutoDeploy project, I have made a lot of research to
find
a tool resp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1 from me.
- -- dims
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> +1
>
>
> Otis--
> Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Ian Holsman
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, December
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 3:31 AM, Ian Holsman wrote:
>
> Dear Incubator PMC,
>
> There has been some discussion around the Cassandra proposal,
> and we would now like to officially propose Cassandra to the Incubator
> for consideration..
>
>
+1 (non-binding)
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
+1
Otis--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Ian Holsman
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 5:01:37 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Accept Cassandra into the Incubator
>
>
> Dear Incubator PMC,
>
> There has
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:
* Cassandra is already deployed within Facebook and many other organizations
are actively moving to deploy this in production. Original developers
are and will actively stay involved and hence there is no realistic
Jean-Baptiste Onofr? wrote:
> Agree :)
>
> I'm OK with OpenDeploy. I'm waiting for the name to change the package naming
> to org.apache.opendeploy
> or org.apache.maestro in place of net.sourceforge.buildprocess.autodeploy.
A simple test ...
Search the net for the single word "OpenDeploy" ...
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:
> * Cassandra is already deployed within Facebook and many other organizations
> are actively moving to deploy this in production. Original developers
> are and will actively stay involved and hence there is no realistic chance
> of it getting o
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:
> ...There has been some discussion around the Cassandra proposal,
> and we would now like to officially propose Cassandra to the Incubator
> for consideration...
+1
-Bertrand
--
Dear Incubator PMC,
There has been some discussion around the Cassandra proposal,
and we would now like to officially propose Cassandra to the Incubator
for consideration..
Please vote on accepting Cassandra project for incubation. The full
Cassandra proposal is available at the end of this mes
As I advised you a week before.
The next step in the process is to set up a vote.
I'll send out the email.
Regards
Ian
Avinash Lakshman wrote:
Hi Folks
Please consider our proposal to move the Cassandra project into the Incubation
process - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Cassandra. Pleas
From: "Upayavira"
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 14:22 -0500, Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi,
IMHO Open* means more a GNU project, think about openjdk, open solaris
Open* is not claimed by GNU. If they claimed anything, it'd be 'free'.
We're free to host 'open*' projects if we wish.
We already have
On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 14:22 -0500, Vincent Siveton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMHO Open* means more a GNU project, think about openjdk, open solaris
Open* is not claimed by GNU. If they claimed anything, it'd be 'free'.
We're free to host 'open*' projects if we wish.
We already have openwebbeans, ope
Hi,
IMHO Open* means more a GNU project, think about openjdk, open solaris
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/12/23, Jean-Baptiste Onofré :
> Agree :)
>
> I'm OK with OpenDeploy. I'm waiting for the name to change the package
> naming to org.apache.opendeploy
> or org.apache.maestro in place of net.so
Hi Folks
Please consider our proposal to move the Cassandra project into the Incubation
process - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Cassandra. Please advice, as to what
else is required for us complete this process.
Cheers
Avinash
---
Hi,
> 1. Forget php.apache.org TLP. We don't want technology umbrellas, and
> working actively to get rid of those we have. So, your aim would be a
> piwi.apache.org TLP instead, which is fine ambition.
that would be great too :-) Or maybe scripting.apache.org? JRuby,
Groovy or other scripting ba
16 matches
Mail list logo