On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Mrinal Wadhwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi Sanjiva,
>
> >> Is there any wire protocol standard involved with this?
> Right now its all HTTP .. we use long polling (Comet) to make the message
> delivery almost instant
>
> >> is there any way to make this interop wi
Hi Sanjiva,
>> Is there any wire protocol standard involved with this?
Right now its all HTTP .. we use long polling (Comet) to make the message
delivery almost instant
>> is there any way to make this interop with twitter? Does twitter have a
server-server communication / federation model too li
@sanjiva - in most work situations, people will 'know' at least a
handful of folk in their immediate 'network' which can provide a
starting point. Tags is one method of discovery as are 'words' used in
messages.
FYI - there is a design discussion underway re: the current client.
D -:)
On Wed, No
(FYI this conversation has no impact on the acceptance or not of the
proposal .. just my curiosity. So if you feel there's a better place for
this conversation please point me there.)
When you say its really a tool to discover right people can you elaborate
on what that means? Is there some pr
@sanjiva - I'll field this as the 'positioning' guy.
You 'can' regard ESME as a 'Twitter for Enterprise' but we prefer not
to do so because we then get tangled in all sorts of arguments and
comparisons that deflect from how we see the service.
The premise upon which we started this project was th
Is there any wire protocol standard involved with this? (Other than HTTP
of course.) Sorry for the dumb question but is there any way to make this
interop with twitter? Does twitter have a server-server communication /
federation model too like XMPP?
Apologies if these questions are RTFM type!
+1 .. very interesting! So if I understand correctly this is like twitter
for the enterprise? Except more generic somehow (not sure whether I get
the pluggability bits and how that works yet from reading the proposal
briefly).
If you need more mentors I'll be happy to help.
Sanjiva.
Darren H
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Darren Hague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...None of us are at ApacheCon, unfortunately - maybe a few of us will be at
> ApacheCon Europe...
You should, if the project is accepted ;-)
> ...I am based in the UK, and happy to chat at any time that suits both ou
On 4 Nov 2008, at 19:02, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...Given that - I'd say that incubation with a handful people or so
at this
stage is, while early and somewhat risky - certainly an option...
I assume you me
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Given that - I'd say that incubation with a handful people or so at this
> stage is, while early and somewhat risky - certainly an option...
I assume you mean "graduation" - and agree that that's an option.
See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008
There is one other project that is recently accepted:
OpenWebBeans
You can still report this month if you want to.
Otherwise, please add your project to the ReportingSchedule
page, ready for next month.
-David
---
Hi Bertrand,
None of us are at ApacheCon, unfortunately - maybe a few of us will be at
ApacheCon Europe...
I am based in the UK, and happy to chat at any time that suits both our
timezones.
Cheers,
Darren
>On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Darren Hague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ...I would l
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Darren Hague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I would like to propose ESME as a project for the Apache Incubator...
Sounds interesting! I'm willing to help as a mentor.
Are any of you guys at ApacheCon by any chance? If yes let us know so
we can have a chat.
-Bert
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> Greg Reddin wrote:
> >
> > Using the path you specified above I was unable to commit a new
> > directory containing sigs and a .zip file.
>
> as david pointed, this is likely to be a permissions issue. you can
> either wait until we've sorted it out or create a JIRA
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > David Crossley wrote:
> >>
> >> I presume that the "pmc-chairs" group should have
> >> access, but it does not currently.
> >>
> >> To Incubator PMC, should we add a special handler
> >> for the "incubator/donations/" directory?
> >
> > I agr
+1 too
Vincent
2008/11/1 David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Greg Reddin wrote:
>> David Crossley wrote:
>> >
>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/donations/
>> > .^
>> >
>> > Is there some documentation that led you astray
>> > or just a slip?
>>
>> I
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to propose Stonehenge as an incubator proposal.
>
> Stonehenge is a set of example applications for Service Oriented
> Architecture that spans languages and platforms and demonstrates best
> practise and interopera
On 11/4/08, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 04 November 2008 9:23:19 am J Aaron Farr wrote:
> > Darren Hague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I would like to propose ESME as a project for the Apache Incubator.
> > >
> > > Enterprise Social Messaging Experiment (ESME) is a sec
On Tuesday 04 November 2008 9:23:19 am J Aaron Farr wrote:
> Darren Hague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I would like to propose ESME as a project for the Apache Incubator.
> >
> > Enterprise Social Messaging Experiment (ESME) is a secure and highly
> > scalable microsharing and micromessaging pla
On 4 Nov 2008, at 14:15, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
I haven't been following CouchDB but a PMC of five seems small - you
only have to loose a couple of people and you're on the verge of not
being a viable project. I took a look through the lists and from what
I can see CouchDB entered incubation with
Members of the Projects in the Incubator:
We put up a session for you in the Barcamp so that you can talk about
your experiences and challenges you face during the incubation
process, get feedback and learn from other projects and the mentors of
the projects.
It is at 3.30pm today on the Second Fl
I'd like to propose Stonehenge as an incubator proposal.
Stonehenge is a set of example applications for Service Oriented
Architecture that spans languages and platforms and demonstrates best
practise and interoperability.
The full proposal is here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StonehengeProp
On Nov 4, 2008, at 5:15 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
Ted, I patched the couchdb.xml project file (http://friendpaste.com/ebk8csvC
)
and updated the committer & mentor lists; can you commit? In
addition, it looks
that some of the dates in the "work items" section are missing. How
to go about
Sounds very interesting. I'd especially like to see this mix of languages
and clients at the ASF.
--
Martin Cooper
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Darren Hague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to propose ESME as a project for the Apache Incubator.
>
> Enterprise Social Messaging Experi
Sweet, I'll +1 it and probably use it :-)
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Darren Hague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to propose ESME as a project for the Apache Incubator.
>
> Enterprise Social Messaging Experiment (ESME) is a secure and highly
> scalable microsharing and micromessagin
On Nov 4, 2008, at 15:08, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Robert,
On Nov 4, 2008, at 14:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
I know theres been a push to get projects to graduate, but IMO
CouchDB
would benefit from growing
Darren Hague <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would like to propose ESME as a project for the Apache Incubator.
>
> Enterprise Social Messaging Experiment (ESME) is a secure and highly
> scalable microsharing and micromessaging platform that allows people
> to discover and meet one another and get
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Nov 4, 2008, at 14:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Niall Pemberton
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I haven't been following CouchDB but a PMC of five seems small
Hi Robert,
On Nov 4, 2008, at 14:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't been following CouchDB but a PMC of five seems small - you
only have to loose a couple of people and you're on the verge of not
being a viable
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't been following CouchDB but a PMC of five seems small - you
> only have to loose a couple of people and you're on the verge of not
> being a viable project. I took a look through the lists and from what
> I can s
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 11:47 AM, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I presume that the "pmc-chairs" group should have
>> access, but it does not currently.
>>
>> To Incubator PMC, should we add a special handler
Niall,
thanks for your feedback.
On Nov 4, 2008, at 01:53, Niall Pemberton wrote:
I haven't been following CouchDB but a PMC of five seems small - you
only have to loose a couple of people and you're on the verge of not
being a viable project. I took a look through the lists and from what
I ca
32 matches
Mail list logo
