I realize I did not propose an end date for this vote.
Assuming no issues arise, I'll call the vote next Monday. Give
everyone the weekend to comment and vote.
Craig
On Sep 23, 2008, at 7:33 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Please vote on accepting Olio into incubation.
The proposal can be foun
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:21 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Jukka Zitting wrote:
> >> Of which we have two; released, or not released, and that's a product
> >> of oversight and a [VOTE]. There are no magical in-betweens.
> >
> > As evidenced by this vote this is hardly the
Paul Querna wrote:
>
> Open an infrastructure JIRA ticket and I'll figure out getting https://
> on www.apache.org sooner or later.
Good thought. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1737
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
So you assume that that www.apache.org can not be hacked? What if a
signing key *IS* in KEYS but not signed by anyone (because the developer
has never attended an Apache key signing event)?
No, I answered your question.
W.r.t. www.apac
David Crossley wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> I liked the way you put the question; it's not up to incubator project to
>> set the rules for Maven. If the maven PMC decides that these incubator
>> releases don't belong in the primary repository, that's their call. But
>> this
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Jukka Zitting wrote:
> >
[snip]
>
> > Are incubating releases official releases of the ASF?
>
> Yes. Otherwise they must be removed from ASF servers.
> There's no middle ground.
>
[snip]
>
> > How strong disclaimers are needed and what level of explicit
> > ackn
+1
Sheetal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Will Sobel
-Original Message-
From: Shanti Subramanyam - PAE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj: Re: [VOTE] accept Olio into incubation
Date: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:38 am
Size: 4K
To: general@incubator.apache.org
+1 (obviously)
Shanti
On 09/23/08
Niall Pemberton wrote:
This is a slight majority (of binding votes) for accepting the
proposed change, but given the clear lack of consensus and the
concerns voiced about that, I unfortunately need to conclude that this
issue should be tabled until better consensus is reached.
If this was
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Please vote on accepting or rejecting this policy change!
>
> The vote ends with the following 15 +1, 12 -1, and one 0 binding votes.
>
>
Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> Of which we have two; released, or not released, and that's a product
>> of oversight and a [VOTE]. There are no magical in-betweens.
>
> As evidenced by this vote this is hardly the consensus. See comments
> like "incubating releases to be treated as full Apache releases"
Jukka Zitting wrote:
There is clearly a widely held feeling that incubating
releases are different than "normal" ASF releases.
This is the crux of the issue. I fail to see how they are fundamentally
different. Releases and the release process is one of the most
standardized things in the AS
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 8:17 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jukka Zitting wrote:
>> This is a slight majority (of binding votes) for accepting the
>> proposed change, but given the clear lack of consensus and the
>> concerns voiced about that, I unfortunately need to con
+1
Akara
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Will Sobel
-Original Message-
From: Shanti Subramanyam - PAE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj: Re: [VOTE] accept Olio into incubation
Date: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:38 am
Size: 4K
To: general@incubator.apache.org
+1 (obviously)
Shanti
On 09/23/08 07:3
Hi Niclas,
Thanks for your feedback, sincerely. Appreciate the time taken.
I'm really not a process junkie and I'm definitely not trying to impose any
ideas here. This suggestion is really off the back of a few items coming up
during our previous graduation debate which were quite a surprise to u
Jukka Zitting wrote:
>
> The vote ends with the following 15 +1, 12 -1, and one 0 binding votes.
>
> This is a slight majority (of binding votes) for accepting the
> proposed change, but given the clear lack of consensus and the
> concerns voiced about that, I unfortunately need to conclude that
Looks like we need one more mentor. Is it redundant to put myself as
one since I'm already the champion and a listed committer?
On Sep 22, 2008, at 4:24 PM, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
This is a proposal to enter the incubator.
See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DroidsProposal for the most
u
+1
Will Sobel
-Original Message-
From: Shanti Subramanyam - PAE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subj: Re: [VOTE] accept Olio into incubation
Date: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:38 am
Size: 4K
To: general@incubator.apache.org
+1 (obviously)
Shanti
On 09/23/08 07:33, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Please vo
+1 (obviously)
Shanti
On 09/23/08 07:33, Craig L Russell wrote:
Please vote on accepting Olio into incubation.
The proposal can be found at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OlioProposal
[This proposal was formerly known as Web20Kit]
The text of the proposal:
OlioProposal
Abstract
Apache O
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-87?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12634180#action_12634180
]
James Dixson commented on INCUBATOR-87:
---
I have faxed in all ICLAs. The CCLA will b
Hi All
With my POI PMC chair hat on, I've been speaking to the company behind the
OpenXML4J[1] library. Within POI, we use OpenXML4J for the fiddly bits in
dealing with ooxml files.
The company behind OpenXML4J would like OpenXML4J to become part of POI.
Having spoken with Robert Burrell Don
On Sep 24, 2008, at 3:44 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:27 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:42 -0400, Hiram Chirino wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:12 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 22/09/2008, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:27 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:42 -0400, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:12 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On 22/09/2008, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> The only reason I sugg
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 1:20 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 09:34 -0400, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>> The only reason I suggested including the sigs in the source distro is
>> because a source build like Apache ServiceMix depends on hundreds of
>> third par
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote on accepting or rejecting this policy change!
The vote ends with the following 15 +1, 12 -1, and one 0 binding votes.
+1 Bertrand Delacretaz
+1 Brett Porter
+1 Bruce Snyder
+1 Davanum Srin
I was planning on closing this vote Friday September 26 at 12:00 ET.
Just a heads up
On Sep 19, 2008, at 12:36 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
This item has been out for discussion for a few weeks. Please
indicate your preference for accepting VCL to the Incubator.
Proposal is included below for
+1 (binding)
(on both accounts: accept olio and add Wicket to the ticket)
Martijn
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:01 AM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I've informed the Wicket team about this incubator request and there
> is interest in providing a wicket-based impleme
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Gang,
Sorry, I didn't realize that SubTasks would still go to the general@ list...
Hmmm...
All those JIRA notices are a good thing -- lets folks review the tasks
making it into the queue (and keeps folks aware of tasks in general,
even if they aren't interested in the
On 24/09/2008, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:54 +0100, sebb wrote:
>
>
> > It's a pity that the Tomcat jars don't contain proper manifests + N &
> > L files; I'll see about raising that with the Tomcat developers.
>
>
> Huh, what?
>
> On my freshly d
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 06:52, Hussain Fakhruddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have prepared a rough draft of a Proposal which I would want ASF to have a
> look.
> I am not sure if this is the correct email where I should be sending it.
> Please consider it.
Your MS Word document attache
Craig,
Thanks. Where is the code now? Igor Vaynberg (from the Wicket
development team) and I (a lowly Wicket user :) are both interested in
working on a wicket implementation (hopefully together). If we could
see what it currently entails, we may be able to get started.
It might be nice if Oli
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> So you assume that that www.apache.org can not be hacked? What if a
>> signing key *IS* in KEYS but not signed by anyone (because the developer
>> has never attended an Apache key signing event)?
>>
>
> Which reminds me -
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Hussain Fakhruddin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have prepared a rough draft of a Proposal which I would want ASF to have
> a look.
> I am not sure if this is the correct email where I should be sending it.
> Please consider it.
>
Yes, this is the correct
Janne Jalkanen wrote:
> >
> >So you assume that that www.apache.org can not be hacked? What if a
> >signing key *IS* in KEYS but not signed by anyone (because the
> >developer
> >has never attended an Apache key signing event)?
>
> Which reminds me - if one does not attend an Apache key signing
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 10:22 +0530, Hussain Fakhruddin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have prepared a rough draft of a Proposal which I would want ASF to
> have a look.
> I am not sure if this is the correct email where I should be sending
> it. Please consider it.
It is the correct mailing list however you f
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Janne Jalkanen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any people near Helsinki, Finland who are willing to have a coffee and sign
> my key? ;-)
I'll be in Helsinki for two weeks after the ApacheCon US.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
---
Hi,
I have prepared a rough draft of a Proposal which I would want ASF to have a
look.
I am not sure if this is the correct email where I should be sending it.
Please consider it.
Thanks,
Regards,
Hussain F.
http://hussulinux.blogspot.com
--
Computers are like airconditioners, they don't funct
So you assume that that www.apache.org can not be hacked? What if a
signing key *IS* in KEYS but not signed by anyone (because the
developer
has never attended an Apache key signing event)?
Which reminds me - if one does not attend an Apache key signing event
(which tend to be in faraway co
37 matches
Mail list logo
