Re: Multiple concerns reviewing BlueSky podling website

2008-07-31 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On 7/31/08, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Andrus Adamchik > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> >> On Jul 31, 2008, at 4:18 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: >> >> - The BlueSky podling website have a download page, that is pointing >>> to non-apache bluesky relea

Re: [PROPOSAL] Etch

2008-07-31 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Friday 01 August 2008 00:16, James Dixson wrote: > This a proposal to enter Etch in to the incubator. > > See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/EtchProposal for updates. > > In particular, we are looking for an interested Champion. Well, you are expected to have found a Champion prior to submitt

Re: Multiple concerns reviewing BlueSky podling website

2008-07-31 Thread Martin Cooper
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > On Jul 31, 2008, at 4:18 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > > - The BlueSky podling website have a download page, that is pointing >> to non-apache bluesky released artifacts. I think this is at least >> very confusing, as i

Re: Multiple concerns reviewing BlueSky podling website

2008-07-31 Thread Andrus Adamchik
On Jul 31, 2008, at 4:18 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: - The BlueSky podling website have a download page, that is pointing to non-apache bluesky released artifacts. I think this is at least very confusing, as it can allude users to think this is a endorsed ASF release. Is this OK ? I don't see

Multiple concerns reviewing BlueSky podling website

2008-07-31 Thread Luciano Resende
While reviewing the BlueSky podling website, I noticed the following issues : - The BlueSky podling website have a download page, that is pointing to non-apache bluesky released artifacts. I think this is at least very confusing, as it can allude users to think this is a endorsed ASF release. Is t

RE: SVN move

2008-07-31 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Upayavira wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > It should be fine to use our infrastructure to hold the source code, as long > > as we don't have license pollution issues. They cannot use it to do > > releases. > Can you clarify what you mean by 'releases'? > They cannot use it to do ASF releases,

[PROPOSAL] Etch

2008-07-31 Thread James Dixson
This a proposal to enter Etch in to the incubator. See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/EtchProposal for updates. In particular, we are looking for an interested Champion. We welcome any and all comments. :-) -- James Dixson -proposal- = Abstract Etch is a cross-platform, language-

Re: SVN move

2008-07-31 Thread Upayavira
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 11:49 +0800, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Wednesday 30 July 2008 18:59, Upayavira wrote: > > i.e. would it be acceptable to do a SourceForge release based upon code > > in the ASF repository? > > Yes, you know that the license allows this. BUT it can't be called an Apache > JS