[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-77?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617537#action_12617537
]
Doug Cutting commented on INCUBATOR-77:
---
Strictly speaking, licensing doesn't need
On Jul 28, 2008, at 10:49 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
Let's turn this around and look at it from a different light. What's
stopping us from doing a 0.9.0 release in the incubator? I'm
guessing that
you need the packages to be the same?
Yes, that is one of the biggest reasons I can see at t
> Let's turn this around and look at it from a different light. What's
> stopping us from doing a 0.9.0 release in the incubator? I'm guessing that
> you need the packages to be the same?
Yes, that is one of the biggest reasons I can see at the moment.
Probably more of a driving force though i
On Jul 28, 2008, at 10:37 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
On Jul 28, 2008, at 10:28 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 28, 2008, at 8:14 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
Where I think that there is a problem is when they ditch their old
infrastructure and exclusively use ASF's infrastructure to build,
On Jul 28, 2008, at 10:28 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 28, 2008, at 8:14 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
Where I think that there is a problem is when they ditch their old
infrastructure and exclusively use ASF's infrastructure to build,
maintain,
and release non-ASF releases. To be sure i
Hi Roland,
On Jul 28, 2008, at 12:49 AM, Roland Weber wrote:
Hi Craig,
Craig L Russell wrote:
[craig] I think I got the attribution correct in this. Please
correct if I got it wrong.
You got it right (I think :-).
Whew!
[roland]Yes, and why shouldn't it be? Anybody can pull Apache
s
On Jul 28, 2008, at 8:14 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
Where I think that there is a problem is when they ditch their old
infrastructure and exclusively use ASF's infrastructure to build,
maintain,
and release non-ASF releases. To be sure in the case of JSecurity
the final
artifacts will not u
+1
Craig
On Jul 28, 2008, at 1:38 AM, Roland Weber wrote:
As explained in INCUBATOR-80, the Table of Contents
of the policy document is inconsistent and contains
broken links.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-80
Please vote on applying the patch provided there.
Votes of IPMC m
Correct me if I am wrong, but what you are saying is that there should
be a record somewhere (such as a Click prior email archive?) where a
person states his intent to donate the code? What if this person was a
committer, and stated his intent by quietly committing the code?
In any case, "r
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Jörn Kottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but i've noticed another potential issue in
>> CasEditor-linux.gtk.x86-2.2.2-incubating.zip which i'll mention in case
>> others object - there are some licenses in the top level LICENSE file and
>> some other licenses in
So, to make this a little more clear, when Wicket performed a few
non-ASF
releases on their old project site was their old Subversion
repository
shutdown and the ASF Subversion repository exclusively used?
Yes. We are volunteers. Having to maintain 2 repositories would have
been prohibitive.
On 7/28/08, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As explained in INCUBATOR-80, the Table of Contents
> of the policy document is inconsistent and contains
> broken links.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-80
>
> Please vote on applying the patch provided there.
>
> Votes of IPM
but i've noticed another potential issue in
CasEditor-linux.gtk.x86-2.2.2-incubating.zip which i'll mention in
case
others object - there are some licenses in the top level LICENSE
file and
some other licenses in the about_files folder that are not mentioned
in the
top LICENSE file. I guess
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, to make this a little more clear, when Wicket performed a few non-ASF
> releases on their old project site was their old Subversion repository
> shutdown and the ASF Subversion repository exclusively used?
Yes. We ar
>
> Where I think that there is a problem is when they ditch their old
> infrastructure and exclusively use ASF's infrastructure to build, maintain,
> and release non-ASF releases. To be sure in the case of JSecurity the final
> artifacts will not use the ASF mirrors but that does not hide the fa
On Jul 26, 2008, at 10:18 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 26, 2008, at 2:47 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you provide one example? Just curious
While it was incubating, Wicket did a few non-ASF relea
On Jul 26, 2008, at 10:10 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 26, 2008, at 1:20 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
On Jul 25, 2008, at 8:50 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 25, 2008, a
On Jul 26, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Roland Weber wrote:
Hi Alan,
see my 0.02€ below...
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 25, 2008, at 8:50 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jul 25, 2008, at 7:38 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Jul 25, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrer
+1
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 5:49 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 28 July 2008 16:38, Roland Weber wrote:
>> [x] +1 apply the patch
>
> Cheers
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
>
> I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
> I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
> I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-77?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12617415#action_12617415
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on INCUBATOR-77:
--
{quote}
my understanding is that thi
[X] +1 apply the patch
cheers,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [X] +1 apply the patch
Martijn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 to apply the patch.
...ant
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As explained in INCUBATOR-80, the Table of Contents
> of the policy document is inconsistent and contains
> broken links.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-80
>
> Please vo
On Monday 28 July 2008 16:38, Roland Weber wrote:
> [x] +1 apply the patch
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
---
As explained in INCUBATOR-80, the Table of Contents
of the policy document is inconsistent and contains
broken links.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-80
Please vote on applying the patch provided there.
Votes of IPMC members are binding. The vote passes
with at least three bindin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-80?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Roland Weber updated INCUBATOR-80:
--
Attachment: 2k8-07-28-policy-toc.txt
The attached patch makes the following modifications to
ToC of the policy is inconsistent
-
Key: INCUBATOR-80
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-80
Project: Incubator
Issue Type: Bug
Components: policy
Reporter: Roland Weber
Thanks for pointing this out; in case of Click, this probably means that
all current contribution, which are already covered by Apache licenses
are fine. So, while it is nice to track down the original authors and
get ICLAs from them to explicitly assign the code to the ASF, it is
actually not real
Hi Andrus,
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Is there existing code in Click written by Ahmed?
Yes. His contribution history can be seen here:
http://fisheye3.atlassian.com/changelog/~author=amohombe/click/
However much of that code is in a his sandbox which is not part of
Click distribution and can
I've added empire-db to the reporting schedule
(http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule)
I took the liberty to add empire-db to the "March, June, September,
December" schema, even though our last 3-month report will be in
October. The number of podlings in "March, June, September, Decem
Hi Craig,
Craig L Russell wrote:
[craig] I think I got the attribution correct in this. Please correct if
I got it wrong.
You got it right (I think :-).
[roland]Yes, and why shouldn't it be? Anybody can pull Apache sources
from
our public SVN repo and make releases with or without modificat
31 matches
Mail list logo
