FYI, according to "git log --stat -p --color-words -M -C --
docs/licenses xdocs/licenses", the words UIMA or uima do not appear in
the whole revision control log (including messages and diffs) of the
docs/licenses and xdocs/licenses directories. I don't think the update
of the document ever happene
sebb wrote:
On 29/06/2008, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Sending to Noel as i.a.o chair to forward..
---EMAIL HEADER---
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSU NOTIFICAT
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
we should remember and capture that Roy raised valid points about having the
*vote* be public, albeit after private discussion. It seemed that the idea was
to discuss it in private, and only vote in public if it was clear that the vote
would go smoothly.
Offhand I do
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Craig L Russell wrote:
> > Would it be worthwhile to capture this discussion in a patch to the
> > offending paragraph?
> We can capture both sentiments.
Yes. But at the same time as Bill and I agree that:
> there's a concrete basis as-policy for not having publi
On 29/06/2008, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>
> > Sending to Noel as i.a.o chair to forward..
> >
> > ---EMAIL HEADER---
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: TSU NOTIFIC
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Sending to Noel as i.a.o chair to forward..
---EMAIL HEADER---
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSU NOTIFICATION - Encryption
---EMAIL BODY---
SUBMISSION TYPE: TSU
SUBMITTED BY:
