Re: [VOTE] Clarify PPMC votes (Incubator Policy)

2008-06-27 Thread Matt Hogstrom
+1 On Jun 26, 2008, at 3:58 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: While updating the PPMC new committer voting guide, I notice that there has been no recent action on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-72 An affirmative vote is required to change the policy, which currently confuses the

Re: [VOTE] 72-hour lazy consensus for podling committer + PPMC member votes (was: INCUBATOR-57 aka IPMC votes...)

2008-06-27 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Craig L Russell wrote: Would it be worthwhile to capture this discussion in a patch to the offending paragraph? We can capture both sentiments... On Jun 27, 2008, at 10:35 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: I have one small problem, and was otherwise +1 on the final pro

Re: [VOTE] 72-hour lazy consensus for podling committer + PPMC member votes (was: INCUBATOR-57 aka IPMC votes...)

2008-06-27 Thread Craig L Russell
Would it be worthwhile to capture this discussion in a patch to the offending paragraph? Craig On Jun 27, 2008, at 10:35 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: I have one small problem, and was otherwise +1 on the final proposed text; This approach is considered inferior

RE: [VOTE] 72-hour lazy consensus for podling committer + PPMC member votes (was: INCUBATOR-57 aka IPMC votes...)

2008-06-27 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Craig.Russell wrote: > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Did anyone actually count the vote? I have no problem with Craig's > > patch, but did anyone actually vote for it? ;-) > It's guide, not policy, so it's CTR. Yes, I had that thought after the fact: we are clarifying the documentation of what we

RE: [VOTE] 72-hour lazy consensus for podling committer + PPMC member votes (was: INCUBATOR-57 aka IPMC votes...)

2008-06-27 Thread Noel J. Bergman
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > I have one small problem, and was otherwise +1 on the final proposed text; > > This approach is considered inferior by many because it is a source of > > discord to have a public vote like this fail or take a very long time. > The reason public votes are inferior is

Re: photo gallery software (previously called Caitrin)

2008-06-27 Thread sebb
On 27/06/2008, Angela Cymbalak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There has been a lot of going back and forth. Originally there seemed to be > little interest at the Incubator so I was talking to the Roller folks. > There is some interest over there but a disagreement on how to write the > code. At th

Re: [VOTE] Clarify PPMC votes (Incubator Policy)

2008-06-27 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While updating the PPMC new committer voting guide, I notice that there has > been no recent action on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-72 > > An affirmative vote is required to change the policy, which cur

Re: photo gallery software (previously called Caitrin)

2008-06-27 Thread Angela Cymbalak
There has been a lot of going back and forth. Originally there seemed to be little interest at the Incubator so I was talking to the Roller folks. There is some interest over there but a disagreement on how to write the code. At the same time there started to be interest at the Incubator aga

Re: [VOTE] Clarify PPMC votes (Incubator Policy)

2008-06-27 Thread Martijn Dashorst
+1 On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While updating the PPMC new committer voting guide, I notice that there has > been no recent action on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-72 > > An affirmative vote is required to change the policy, which