I suspect thrift is missing from everywhere that it needs adding. Thanks for
pointing this one out, I'll get it sorted.
Upayavira
- original message -
Subject:Re: MISSING REPORTS: Composer, Pig, RAT and Shindig
From: "Bertrand Delacretaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 24/06/2008
On Jun 23, 2008, at 9:28 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:22:03PM -0700, Ted Leung wrote:
I was on vacation all of last week, which is why I didn't vote. I
did
give you feedback about the initial tarball, which was missing a
NOTICEs
file.
I apologise for this, I should
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:31:59PM -0700, Ted Leung wrote:
>> +1, since it leaves me as a single point of failure.
>
> Not only that, but this vote cannot pass without the other two mentors
I don't think you need votes
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Upayavira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Well, clearly your fever meant you forgot Thrift. My own failing there
Thrift is also missing from the list of projects at
http://incubator.apache.org/ , could you fix that?
-Bertrand
-
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've updated https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-57 with the
> changes proposed by Justin, Noel, and Bill. Please take a look.
Your latest patch there looks good to me, thanks!
-Bertrand
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Suh Changhee closed INCUBATOR-76.
--
> Bad link on http://incubator.apache.org/projects/hama.html
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Suh Changhee resolved INCUBATOR-76.
Resolution: Fixed
It's fixed.
Now I have permission to resolve and close this issue.
Hi Suh,
I've changed the permission scheme to allow you to resolve and close
issues that you've opened.
Please log in to JIRA and try to resolve your issue.
Thanks,
Craig
On Jun 19, 2008, at 9:39 PM, Suh Changhee (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-76?page
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> Inexperience with Open Source:
>> Empire-db has been Open Source from its start in 2001, but it has only
>> been publicly available since January 2008.
>
>This is odd to say the least, and from the empire-db.org [1] website I
>find this quote:
>
>"In summer 200
I've updated https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-57 with
the changes proposed by Justin, Noel, and Bill. Please take a look.
Craig
On Jun 23, 2008, at 12:56 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Umm... why "no binding -1 votes"? I thought adding a committer
wasn'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Craig Russell updated INCUBATOR-57:
---
Attachment: incubator-57.patch
> In the PPMC guide, clarify how to vote in a new committer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Craig Russell updated INCUBATOR-57:
---
Attachment: (was: incubator-57.diff)
> In the PPMC guide, clarify how to vote in a new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Craig Russell updated INCUBATOR-57:
---
Attachment: incubator-57.diff
ppmc.html
ppmc.xml
> In the P
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Craig Russell updated INCUBATOR-57:
---
Attachment: (was: smime.p7s)
> In the PPMC guide, clarify how to vote in a new committe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Craig Russell reopened INCUBATOR-57:
A number of members have suggested changes to the process of voting in a new
committer.
>
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:31:59PM -0700, Ted Leung wrote:
> +1, since it leaves me as a single point of failure.
Not only that, but this vote cannot pass without the other two mentors.
>> Are you happy with me updating the MD5/SHA files as outlined
>> previously?
>
> Yes.
Great, I have updated
Ours is up at http://wiki.apache.org/thrift/BoardReportJune2008
Should we copy it over to the incubator page?
Upayavira wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 14:22 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> > Pig did report: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2008. Is there
>> > anything else we need to do?
>>
>
Daniel Kulp wrote:
Umm... why "no binding -1 votes"? I thought adding a committer wasn't
a vetoable thing, just code modifications. This should be a majority
approval vote thing. (with it linked to
http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval for
details)
A -1 should
On Jun 23, 2008, at 12:28 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:22:03PM -0700, Ted Leung wrote:
I was on vacation all of last week, which is why I didn't vote. I
did
give you feedback about the initial tarball, which was missing a
NOTICEs
file.
I apologise for this, I should
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:22:03PM -0700, Ted Leung wrote:
> I was on vacation all of last week, which is why I didn't vote. I did
> give you feedback about the initial tarball, which was missing a NOTICEs
> file.
I apologise for this, I should have mentioned explicitly that the vote/feedback
was
On Jun 20, 2008, at 7:37 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
Hello,
This is the first release under the patronage of the ASF Incubator.
The community has voted on and approved a proposal to release 0.8.0-
incubating.
Unfortunately, we did not have any votes or feedback from our mentors.
I was on vacat
Craig Russell wrote:
> Noel's proposed change to Justin's proposed change is better but I'd
> prefer that the process be crisper in the case that the PPMC vote
> fails to get the required three PMC member votes.
OK. But I find it difficult to see precisely what change(s) you're
proposing to the
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 14:22 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > Pig did report: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2008. Is there
> > anything else we need to do?
>
> No, sorry. Brain cramp. My excuse is running a fever. :-)
Well, clearly your fever meant you forgot Thrift. My own failing ther
Hi Noel,
Almost there. I've posted an update to your update.
Thanks,
Craig
On Jun 23, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Craig,
-1
But as I've said earlier, there is no indication here that three +1
votes are needed from incubator PMC members.
Needs work.
I agree with your c
Noel's proposed change to Justin's proposed change is better but I'd
prefer that the process be crisper in the case that the PPMC vote
fails to get the required three PMC member votes.
Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the
Incubator private list. The notice is
On Jun 23, 2008, at 2:40 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
As has been noted, the text of Justin's proposal fails to address
that if the vote fails to gain the required binding votes, it is NOT
lazy consensus. The standard rules still apply, and the PMC vote
would be required to supplement the
Craig,
> -1
> But as I've said earlier, there is no indication here that three +1
> votes are needed from incubator PMC members.
> Needs work.
I agree with your concerns, but how do you feel with the amendment I
posted a few minutes ago?
--- Noel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptog
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> I'd like to ask for a vote on Justin's proposal below
There is the missing nuance that must be addressed (see below), but with that
fixed, I'm +1.
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
> > Currently on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, we
-1
The proposed process improves on the existing process by aligning it
better with the process by which a PMC communicates with the board.
But as I've said earlier, there is no indication here that three +1
votes are needed from incubator PMC members.
It makes people crazy if they have t
The top two issues of discussion in the past month are textual revision(s)
to make it clearer that the Incubator runs the same as every other ASF
project: only PMC votes are binding, although we encourage everyone from the
broader community and the especially the PPMC to cast (non-binding) votes;
a
Chris,
> We reported feb, april and may of this year, and were living under the
> assumption our next reporting moment would be further in the future.
> Our apologies.
OK, if you reported Feb, April and May, you're fine. I'm going by what had
been put on the wiki for the schedule. This is the l
> Pig did report: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2008. Is there
> anything else we need to do?
No, sorry. Brain cramp. My excuse is running a fever. :-)
I already have already included Pig in the June report.
--- Noel
--
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> +1
>
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> | +1
> |
> | On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |> Hi,
> |>
> |> I
We reported feb, april and may of this year, and were living under the
assumption our next reporting moment would be further in the future.
Our apologies.
Shindig is working on this now and we'll update the wiki asap, once we
had the chance to bounce it of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Chr
Pig did report: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2008. Is there
anything else we need to do?
Olga
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 10:28 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: MISSING REPORTS: Composer, Pi
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jukka Zitting wrote:
>
>> The Composer [and] Pig projects were missing from the reporting
>> schedule. I took the liberty of assigning them all to the March,
>> June, September, December schedule
>
> And once again, Compo
Jukka Zitting wrote:
> The Composer [and] Pig projects were missing from the reporting
> schedule. I took the liberty of assigning them all to the March,
> June, September, December schedule
And once again, Composer and Pig have failed to report, along with log4php,
RAT, and Shindig.
---
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Inexperience with Open Source:
> Empire-db has been Open Source from its start in 2001, but it has only
> been publicly available since January 2008.
This is odd to say the least, and from the empire-db.
Please see also http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Empire-dbProposal
Comments until End of the week, if nothing blocking comes up, I intend
to CfV on Monday 30.6.08
--- cut ---
= Empire-db Proposal =
This proposal is an application for the Empire-db Open Source component
to become a new top-level
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
| +1
|
| On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> Hi,
|>
|> I'd like to ask for a vote on Justin's proposal below, to change the
|> "Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list.." p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-77?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12607176#action_12607176
]
Ian Holsman commented on INCUBATOR-77:
--
correction
md5 is
$ md5sum locallucene.tgz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-77?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ian Holsman updated INCUBATOR-77:
-
Attachment: locallucene.tgz.asc
code is 11M and is located on
http://people.apache.org/~ianh/l
[IP-GRANT] Local Lucene/Solr Code Dump
--
Key: INCUBATOR-77
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-77
Project: Incubator
Issue Type: New Feature
Environment: lucene.apache.org
The vote to publish Apache Sling ended positive with six +1 votes from:
Paul Fremantle
Davanum Srinivas
Luciano Resende (non-binding)
Carsten Ziegeler
Jukka Zitting
Bertrand Delacretaz
I'll upload the release asap.
Thanks everyone for voting!
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
+1
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to ask for a vote on Justin's proposal below, to change the
> "Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list.." paragraph at
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html .
>
> There were lots of +1s
Hi,
I'd like to ask for a vote on Justin's proposal below, to change the
"Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list.." paragraph at
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html .
There were lots of +1s in the original thread, and a minor concern
that this does not explicitely that 3 +1 votes from
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...What concerns me is the mentors who have not voted...
Same here.
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-
47 matches
Mail list logo
