On 3/27/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 27/03/2008, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/27/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > This release is tagged at:
> > > >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0.5-incubator/
> > >
> > > -1: ther
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On 3/28/08, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"The PRIOR rules said you place/retain copyright notices on each file.
The NEW policy says you can skip that, move them into a NOTICE. The policy
*never* granted you the right to remove them altogether, or m
So, where do we stand on the vote? Is the vote still open, or are we
going to resolve XAP-579 (source and binary builds) and try again with
a 0.5.1 ?
I've been reviewing the 0.5.0 build. I'm not sure all of the samples
work, because I'm not sure what all of them are suppose to do :), but
I would l
On 27/03/2008, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/27/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This release is tagged at:
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0.5-incubator/
> >
> > -1: there should be NOTICE and LICENSE files at the top level in SV
On 28/03/2008, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 27 March 2008, sebb wrote:
> > On 26/03/2008, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > The staging area is at:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.5-incubator
> >
> > The binary jar contains lots of non-
+1 on bringing this into incubation. I think it still needs a mentor
and I am also concerned about lack of interest from Hadoop, but they
have their own fish to fry, as they say, and it shouldn't stop this
from going forward.
I think it will be useful in Mahout, if there are Java APIs expo
On 3/28/08, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "The PRIOR rules said you place/retain copyright notices on each file.
> The NEW policy says you can skip that, move them into a NOTICE. The policy
> *never* granted you the right to remove them altogether, or make the
> providenc
On Thursday 27 March 2008, sebb wrote:
> On 26/03/2008, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The staging area is at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.5-incubator
>
> The binary jar contains lots of non-CXF jars in the lib directory;
> these should probably be dropped and li
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I assume you mean the following thread:
http://apache.markmail.org/message/jangmpbssvvd73az
Although from memory I don't remember it being conclusive.
Is any thread on general@ really ever concluded, unless someone offers
up a [vote] ;-?
But this statement stands;
"Th
On 3/28/08, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "In particular, every artifact distributed must contain appropriate
> > LICENSE and NOTICE files."
> These SHOULD be present, in any instance it should be possible to discover
> the providence of a file from an arbitrary svn checkou
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:11 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > On 3/27/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > This release is tagged at:
> >> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0.5-incubator/
> >>
> >> -1: ther
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On 3/27/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This release is tagged at:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0.5-incubator/
-1: there should be NOTICE and LICENSE files at the top level in SVN.
According to my knowledge there is no policy th
Dear IPMC,
I'd like to know what's going on in the proposal.
If there isn't any problem, I would assume this could be encouraged
further to vote.
--
B. Regards,
Edward J. Yoon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For add
On 3/27/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This release is tagged at:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0.5-incubator/
>
> -1: there should be NOTICE and LICENSE files at the top level in SVN.
>
> -1: SVN and the source archive don't agree; there are files and
>
Hi All,
I can definitely see the value in having rules that allow for discussion and
some subjective assessment of podlings by the IPMC.
I think some additional detail (best practice style ?) around what a diverse
community looks like from various angles would be really helpful for podling
projec
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Endre Stølsvik wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Make it absolutely clear that the diversity of the community
will be judged by the IPMC based on the overall conduct of
the project, mailing list, commit activity etc.
I'm not sure that "diversity" and "conduct" are really mappin
Endre Stølsvik wrote:
> Thilo Goetz wrote:
> > Make it absolutely clear that the diversity of the community
> > will be judged by the IPMC based on the overall conduct of
> > the project, mailing list, commit activity etc.
I'm not sure that "diversity" and "conduct" are really mapping that way. A
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:55 AM, Endre Stølsvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thilo Goetz wrote:
> > Make it absolutely clear that the diversity of the community
> > will be judged by the IPMC based on the overall conduct of the
>
> One obvious problem with such approaches is that the criteria wi
Dear root,
Please create an id for Giorgio Zoppi on the Tuscany project under
Incubation.
Preferred userid: giorgio or 2nd choice gzoppi
Full name: Giorgio Zoppi
Forwarding email address:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested Karma for: ws-tuscany
ICL
Thilo Goetz wrote:
It's just that to an outsider, it is totally unclear what that
means. And it may be impossible to really convey the meaning
of it in a few sentences. So why don't we just say so.
Make it absolutely clear that the diversity of the community
will be judged by the IPMC based o
Oracle has contributed some new translation message bundles to Apache
MyFaces (for the Trinidad project):
- The ASF secretary has recorded the software grant.
- The code (+ checksums) was uploaded to Jira issue TRINIDAD-744.[1]
- The ip clearance form was added to the Incubator site.[2] *
- Th
Matthieu Riou wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Robert Greig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I think this is an important topic for future incubator project groups
to have clarified.
"The project is not highly dependent on any single contributor (there
are at
least 3 legally independent co
22 matches
Mail list logo
