Marshall Schor wrote:
We've put the LICENSE, NOTICES, and DISCLAIMERs into the top directory
of the source (and binary) distribution(s), but didn't realize this also
needs to be in the top level of the SVN tag, because we didn't know that
was considered part of the "distribution".
Can you please
We've put the LICENSE, NOTICES, and DISCLAIMERs into the top directory
of the source (and binary) distribution(s), but didn't realize this also
needs to be in the top level of the SVN tag, because we didn't know that
was considered part of the "distribution".
Can you please confirm this is the cas
resend from an email that won't need moderation (sorry for the dup).
sebb wrote:
> On 15/12/2007, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> sebb wrote:
>>
>>> The NOTICE file in uimaj-2.2.1-incubating-bin.zip refers to the
>>> contributions from IBM:
>>>
>>> "Software Grant License Agre
On 15/12/2007, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > [Eventually found the KEYS file in SVN, but it might be helpful to
> > provide a pointer in the vote mails]
> >
> >
> yeah, I went to their website and followed the link from there.
So did I.
> > The NOTICE file in uimaj
sebb wrote:
[Eventually found the KEYS file in SVN, but it might be helpful to
provide a pointer in the vote mails]
yeah, I went to their website and followed the link from there.
The NOTICE file in uimaj-2.2.1-incubating-bin.zip refers to the
contributions from IBM:
"Software Grant Licens
On Dec 15, 2007, at 1:43 PM, sebb wrote:
[Eventually found the KEYS file in SVN, but it might be helpful to
provide a pointer in the vote mails]
The NOTICE file in uimaj-2.2.1-incubating-bin.zip refers to the
contributions from IBM:
"Software Grant License Agreement", informally known as the
[Eventually found the KEYS file in SVN, but it might be helpful to
provide a pointer in the vote mails]
The NOTICE file in uimaj-2.2.1-incubating-bin.zip refers to the
contributions from IBM:
"Software Grant License Agreement", informally known as the
"IBM UIMA License Agreement".
however, that
I reviewed the rat reports, checked the asc signatures, did a cursory
review of DISCLAIMER, NOTICE, and LICENSE files in a couple of the src
and bin files, and it all looks good to me.
+1
btw, the way you provide the rat reports up front is *very* helpful.
-jean
Michael Baessler wrote:
The
