On Wednesday 12 December 2007 19:45, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> I couldn't see a STATUS file in svn
You have mention this for the Yoko project as well, and I start to wonder who
of us two has misunderstood what the so called "status file" is.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/sites.html says tha
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 19:45, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> Have they met the exit criteria?
>
> I couldn't see a STATUS file in svn - but the website[1] doesn't have
> a date against "Check and make sure that the papers that transfer
> rights to the ASF been received. It is only necessary to tr
2007-December Imperius Incubator status report
Imperius has been incubating since November 2007.
Imperius is a rule-based infrastructure management tool
Infrastructure has been partly set up. Mailing lists for dev, commits,
private, and user are operational. The repository has been set up.
Com
+1
Bill
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
Community. In a nutshell the proposal is to create a Yoko sub-project
of Apache Geronimo for the Core ORB and to move the bindings to CXF.
Please read the proposal below for all the detail.
On Dec 12, 2007, at 3:34 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 4:14 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yoko has done a release before so I would assume that the due-
dilligence
has been completed.
The Yoko status file has nothing recorded to that effect and it
doesn't seem ri
On Dec 12, 2007 10:53 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Gang,
> As the Mentor, I hereby call for a vote to graduate the FtpServer project.
Have they met the exit criteria?
I couldn't see a STATUS file in svn - but the website[1] doesn't have
a date against "Check and make sure tha
On Dec 11, 2007 4:14 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yoko has done a release before so I would assume that the due-dilligence
> has been completed.
The Yoko status file has nothing recorded to that effect and it
doesn't seem right to me to go on assumptions.
http://svn.apache.org/r
On Dec 11, 2007 4:09 PM, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'd say that the respective PMC's should fill up the IP Clearance form and
> treat the incoming code just like any other
> new contribution to an existing project.
The way I
Gang,
As the Mentor, I hereby call for a vote to graduate the FtpServer project.
The MINA PMC has accepted FtpServer to become a subproject in the MINA
project.
The rationale is;
- FtpServer has been revamped with the high-performant MINA architecture.
- MINA are expanding the scope to include
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 11:26, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
[x] +1 Approve the below proposal and code migration to
Apache Geronimo and CXF respectively
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here;
10 matches
Mail list logo
