Thank you all for your comments. I assume everyone's questions
so far have been satisfactorily answered and concerns addressed.
Below is the resolution updated as Bill suggested. In the absence
of further discussion I plan to close the vote at the end of the
business day tomorrow (US/Mountain time
On 10/15/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Taking a quick sample of the mailing list, the only contributors to
> >> the discussion thread on Graduation, which I would assume would have
> >> been a hot topic, were from the vendor.
> >
> >
> > I remember contributing to discussion on
On 10/15/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2) It has survived key members of the project jumping ship and forking the
> code*
> * Personally I think you should have disclosed your previous involvement in
> this project to the IPMC when you started this thread.
probably so: but
>
> I was thinking primarily of people who were on the TLP PMC proposal.
> But yes, you and Matthew did help draft that proposal.
I also took part in some other discussions.
As the
> diversity sub-thread was taken to the private list (which is kind of
> ironic in itself) there may also have been
I don't see that has any relevance to this discussion. If someone wants to
do a presentation about Apache HTTPD focussing on mod_proxy and mod_rewrite
it doesn't mean the other modules aren't important.
Paul
On 10/15/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 15, 2007, at 8:02 PM, Pa
On Oct 15, 2007, at 8:02 PM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
Is it stated somewhere that the Java SCA/SDO components are "core"
compared
to C++ and DAS?
And then in a coincidence of timing, there is this:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200710.mbox/%
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
%3e
wh
On Oct 15, 2007, at 8:02 PM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
Jeremy
Neither of the two independents
are active in the core project areas of Java SCA or SDO (they are
committing to the C++ implementation or to DAS).
Is it stated somewhere that the Java SCA/SDO components are "core"
compared
to C++
Jeremy
Neither of the two independents
> are active in the core project areas of Java SCA or SDO (they are
> committing to the C++ implementation or to DAS).
Is it stated somewhere that the Java SCA/SDO components are "core" compared
to C++ and DAS?
Taking a quick sample of the mailing list, t
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently mentoring two other projects, so it's not clear how much
time I can put in.
With that disclaimer, I'm happy to volunteer as a mentor.
Craig
Thanks Craig! I expect to get the outstanding vote wrapped up by end of
this week.
Bill
-
On Oct 13, 2007, at 10:07 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Ant,
Are there any issues that should be pointed out, such as the
(hopefully)
mechanical licensing header issue in stdcxx, or community
diversity, which
at least in part is measuring independence from corporate backing
(a popular
thread
The Incubator enjoyed another good month.
Tuscany and stdcxx are in the process of graduation votes and preparation of
TLP proposals. Ivy graduated into Ant. TripleSoup and JUICE are being put
into a dormant status. "Pig" is *just* coming in, and "Imperius" should
enter Incubation shortly. The
On 10/13/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/13/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/13/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > So bringing together all the comments so far gives something like:
> >
> > ...establish a Project Manage
12 matches
Mail list logo
