On Oct 15, 2007, at 8:02 PM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
Jeremy
Neither of the two independents
are active in the core project areas of Java SCA or SDO (they are
committing to the C++ implementation or to DAS).
Is it stated somewhere that the Java SCA/SDO components are "core"
compared
to C++ and DAS?
s/core/most active/
I still find it odd that Tuscany is aiming for graduation when in the
two most active sections of the project there are no active
independents.
Taking a quick sample of the mailing list, the only contributors to
the discussion thread on Graduation, which I would assume would have
been a hot topic, were from the vendor.
I remember contributing to discussion on Graduation. Maybe you
don't count
me? I know I'm an ex-corporate but then so are you!
I was thinking primarily of people who were on the TLP PMC proposal.
But yes, you and Matthew did help draft that proposal. As the
diversity sub-thread was taken to the private list (which is kind of
ironic in itself) there may also have been some discussion there I
missed as well.
As a mentor you are much closer to the project than I am - why do you
think Tuscany is ready to graduate with such a skewed PMC and
committer base?
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
