Craig L Russell wrote:
>
> o The podling's developer list, with notice posted to the Incubator
> general list. The notice is a separate email forwarding the vote email
> with a cover statement that this vote is underway on the podling's
> developer list. This is a good approach if you are sure of
I'd like to discuss one detail of the process for new committers.
On May 30, 2007, at 10:56 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
If the nominee is already an Apache committer on another project,
the proposer asks the incubator PMC chair to update the
authorization file to include the nominee as a comm
Here's what I'd like to do with the ppmc guide. Change:
Voting in a new committer
If a developer has contributed a significant number of high-quality
patches, is interested in continuing the contribution, and has
demonstrated the ability to work well with others under the Apache
guidelines,
Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> On May 30, 2007, at 8:11 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
>
>> Craig L Russell wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Carl,
>>>
>>> On May 30, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>>>
One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views
from different members
Hi,
for those who are interested: A new version 0.5 of the Release Audit
Tool is available from
http://code.google.com/p/arat/
Compared to the previous version 0.4.1, the following changes have been made:
* Added header matcher for DoJo.
* Refactoring existing codebase to separate concerns
Hi Jean,
On May 30, 2007, at 8:11 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Carl,
On May 30, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views
from different members of the Incubator PMC on: "Who can and
who can
not s
On May 30, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Craig Russell wrote:
I'd like to open the discussion on the "best practice" referred to by
the guides/ppmc because I'm not convinced that best practice for a
TLP is best practice for the incubator.
Personally, if I saw a vote on the incu
Rajith Attapattu wrote:
> Now that we have 3 votes from IPMC, can we please proceed with the accout
> creation for arnuad?
Yes. Please have one of your Mentors follow through on the account request.
> Had Yoav enough time to familliarize himself with the project, I am sure
he
> would have voted
Carl Trieloff wrote:
> One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views from
> different members of the Incubator PMC on: "Who can and who can not
> send the account setup mail to root?"
The view that counts is from
http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#newcommitter. Please note
Craig Russell wrote:
> I'd like to open the discussion on the "best practice" referred to by
> the guides/ppmc because I'm not convinced that best practice for a
> TLP is best practice for the incubator.
> Personally, if I saw a vote on the incubator private PMC list for a
> new committer on a po
Gilles Scokart wrote:
> My understanding is that ASF provide us some kind of 'legal'
> protection (I don't know which one) provided that you have
> send your ICLA. Isn't it a type of contract?
There are several issues, but there is no "contract" between the ASF and
Committers to protect them, al
Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
> On May 30, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
>
>> One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views
>> from different members of the Incubator PMC on: "Who can and who can
>> not send the account setup mail to root?"
>>
>> Given each
On 30/05/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Yoav,
On May 30, 2007, at 6:38 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 5/30/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Personally, if I saw a vote on the incubator private PMC list for a
>> new committer on a podling, including refe
Hi Yoav,
On May 30, 2007, at 6:38 AM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 5/30/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Personally, if I saw a vote on the incubator private PMC list for a
new committer on a podling, including references to the PPMC
discussion and vote, I would be inclined to vot
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Carl,
On May 30, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views
from different members of the Incubator PMC on: "Who can and who can
not send the account setup mail to root?"
Given each new committer vote
Hi Carl,
On May 30, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views
from different members of the Incubator PMC on: "Who can and who
can not send the account setup mail to root?"
Given each new committer vote will have 3 PMC votes
Hi,
On 5/30/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Personally, if I saw a vote on the incubator private PMC list for a
new committer on a podling, including references to the PPMC
discussion and vote, I would be inclined to vote for that committer.
On the other hand, if I saw a vote on t
On 5/30/07, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
behind this practice. If the mail to root has to be cc-ed to general
list and PPMC and has 3 PMC votes on it then it would seem to me that
it could be send by anyone.
I can only think of one reason: [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not accessible to
PPM
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 20:59, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> I like the second option. thanks for bringing this up.
I don't. It assumes that the [Discuss] thread was all dandy. If not, then the
vote passes in public and the Incubator PMC will become the 'bad guys who
doesn't let X in'.
Looking at
Hi Dims,
It wasn't completely clear from my message, but I intended this to be
a choice of the PPMC (with guidance by the Mentors) to hold the votes
either in private or in public.
I'd like to get others' input as well on whether the guidance here
should be
1. private vote on PPMC then
One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views from
different members of the Incubator PMC on: "Who can and who can not
send the account setup mail to root?"
Given each new committer vote will have 3 PMC votes, why does a mentor
have to send the account setup to root?
I like the second option. thanks for bringing this up.
thanks,
dims
On 5/30/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to open the discussion on the "best practice" referred to by
the guides/ppmc because I'm not convinced that best practice for a
TLP is best practice for the incuba
I'd like to open the discussion on the "best practice" referred to by
the guides/ppmc because I'm not convinced that best practice for a
TLP is best practice for the incubator.
The reason is that PPMC votes have no legal status. And incubator PMC
members generally don't track podlings close
Having seen this identical discussion at least half a dozen times,
I've committed changes to the guides/ppmc document removing the
distracting (P) from the discussion on new committers.
The new text says
Only votes cast by Incubator PMC members are binding. If the vote is
positive, and the
Noel,
Now that we have 3 votes from IPMC, can we please proceed with the accout
creation for arnuad?
Thanks Henry for giving the +1 for this thread. Besides Yoav has +0 so I
guess there are no objections at all.
Arnaud has been very active in the last two months and he throughly deserves
to be a
I'll see that it gets added then.
Martijn
On 5/30/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nice graphics, tying in several of the key items and time lines. I
like it.
Craig
On May 28, 2007, at 6:52 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> I've created a schedule for graduation:
>
> http://www.fli
+1
Paul
On 5/30/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from me.
thanks,
dims
On 5/29/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/29/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/29/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 5/27/07, ant
Gilles Scokart wrote:
> My understanding is that ASF provide us some kind of 'legal'
> protection (I don't know which one) provided that you have send your
> ICLA. Isn't it a type of contract?
Acutally, that would be the AL (which you license your contributions under)
which says "no warranty - do
My understanding is that ASF provide us some kind of 'legal'
protection (I don't know which one) provided that you have send your
ICLA. Isn't it a type of contract?
Gilles
2007/5/30, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 12:42, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Mmm - bzzz -
29 matches
Mail list logo
