Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> Bill, do you have some cycles to spare helping out with this project?
I'll periodically poke my nose in to help - but it won't be in the next
three weeks. I'll certainly observe enough to offer them some thoughts
for their 1/month report updates, in terms of moving thi
Ted Leung wrote:
> > Clearly there needs to be some corrective action, and more guidance
> > on how an ASF project is supposed to conduct itself.
> That's not much of a plan, which is what the board is asking for.
Perhaps not, but it got folks talking. :-)
> Paul and I are about at our wit's e
Hey Ted,
Bottom line: there's some issues with the heraldry community to fix,
it's their responsibility to fix it, looks like you guys did a good
job of that so far to me, we should give heraldry some more time to
try and fix things.
On Jan 30, 2007, at 8:24 AM, Ted Leung wrote:
Paul and
On Jan 30, 2007, at 8:05 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
If there's significant XML processing involved
there'll have to be some eventually! Can't do RDF without RDF/
XML...and can't do SPARQL without sparql result sets...
For now I guess we sort-of plan on just using redland whenever we do
Hey Bill,
Without speaking for Kevin, I think that is very good feedback. As to
your points with my interpretation.
Kevin is speaking on behalf of JanRain which is the company that has
done the majority of OpenID implementations to-date. What I see him
expressing is their commitment to moving th
+1 to giving them a second chance.
Sanjiva.
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 12:25 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > Sorry to be blunt. "Can it!" - That's what we did with TSIK. There's
> > no point continuing incubation. We are not here to serve the interests
> > of parties/
Recordon, David wrote:
> Hi all,
> As Ted mentioned there was a thread started yesterday by Kevin Turner (
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-heraldry-dev/200701.m
> box/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) about how JanRain really
> is now committed to moving all of their work into the Heraldry pr
+1 from me, despite my still sparse understanding of semantic Web stuff.
If there's significant XML processing involved, might I suggest you
consider using Axiom/C from Axis2/C? That's the XML Infoset model we use
and its fast and works. Plus I'm sure you can help improve it :).
Thanks,
Sanjiva.
Hi all,
As Ted mentioned there was a thread started yesterday by Kevin Turner (
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-heraldry-dev/200701.m
box/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) about how JanRain really
is now committed to moving all of their work into the Heraldry project.
As to not reproduce everyt
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Sorry to be blunt. "Can it!" - That's what we did with TSIK. There's
> no point continuing incubation. We are not here to serve the interests
> of parties/corporations.
Dims - I agree with you, with fair warning. It's clear that the committers
and actual authors are stil
Sorry to be blunt. "Can it!" - That's what we did with TSIK. There's
no point continuing incubation. We are not here to serve the interests
of parties/corporations.
thanks,
dims
On 1/30/07, Ted Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 29, 2007, at 10:49 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> The ASF Boa
On 1/30/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If it's helpful, the notes we are using for the Struts 2 release under
Maven are here:
* http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/creating-and-signing-a-distribution.html
They are very specific, mainly because I'm getting on in years, and if
we don't h
On Jan 30, 2007, at 12:52 PM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
"Garrett Rooney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I would avoid creating a -user list until it's actually proven
necessary. In the beginning keeping user questions on the dev list
makes sense to me.
Me too. One less mailing list to deal with is al
"Garrett Rooney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would avoid creating a -user list until it's actually proven
> necessary. In the beginning keeping user questions on the dev list
> makes sense to me.
Me too. One less mailing list to deal with is always a good thing.
--
jaaron
-
I'm +1 on this project. Looks fun.
Paul
On 1/30/07, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/29/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do you think?
+1
(Full disclosure, I work at Joost, but not on anything related to this
stuff, I just think it's a neat project.)
One commen
On 1/29/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What do you think?
+1
(Full disclosure, I work at Joost, but not on anything related to this
stuff, I just think it's a neat project.)
One comment on the proposal itself though:
Mailing lists:
[EMAIL PROTECT
On 1/30/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/29/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...This is a proposal to start a rdf database server project at apache.
>
> What do you think?..
/me thinks: go ahead!
+1 here, too. I am so excited just imagining storing Dublin
17 matches
Mail list logo
