On Jan 30, 2007, at 8:05 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
If there's significant XML processing involved
there'll have to be some eventually! Can't do RDF without RDF/ XML...and can't do SPARQL without sparql result sets...
For now I guess we sort-of plan on just using redland whenever we do XML, which uses gnome's libxml2 if I'm not mistaken, which I thought was sort-of the standard XML toolkit for native stuff.
might I suggest you consider using Axiom/C from Axis2/C?
What kind of processing would we consider it for? How does it relate to libxml2?
Does it come as a seperate distribution? Where? Is it supported that way? What about documentation? Are there existing non-WS projects using it? Does it have backwards compatibility practices and standards?
(Yes yes, I know, ask on the right mailing list :-))
That's the XML Infoset model we use and its fast and works. Plus I'm sure you can help improve it :).
I don't even really know what XML infoset is; scrolling through the W3C docs it sounds like a document-oriented thing, which RDF isn't!
ciao! - Leo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
