On Nov 10, 2006, at 7:03 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
On 11/10/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
6. Cayenne:
Mentors:Jean Anderson, Brian McAllister, Bill Dudney
Started:March 2006
Incomplete: Nothing
Diverity: Unknown
Releases: 1
All eight
On 11/10/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
6. Cayenne:
Mentors:Jean Anderson, Brian McAllister, Bill Dudney
Started:March 2006
Incomplete: Nothing
Diverity: Unknown
Releases: 1
All eight of the Cayenne committers are independent of each other
> There is an issue with building the site from a windows platform that
> causes the eols to get all mixed up.
See http://www.apache.org/dev/version-control.html#https-svn, specifically
the last two paragraphs, starting with "Committers will need to properly
..." This is why Roy made his comment
On 11/10/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> There seems to be a persistent delusion that
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is where incubation happens.
>
> That is perjorative. Want to start again?
I just spent a considerable amount of time go
On Friday November 10 2006 7:24 pm, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > Similarly, I'm seeing a number of files that show up with every
> > single line changed, when AFAICT all that should change is the
> > removal of a single line from the list of projects. What's up with
> > that?
>
> Do you really want
I made a change this morning and also noticed that a lot of files I had
not touched were listed as modified. In looking at them the content was
unchanged.
I did have to run build -fix to get my checkins to work. There is an
issue with building the site from a windows platform that causes the
eols t
On Nov 10, 2006, at 3:40 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
So, I'm trying to finish off the job of removing lucene4c from the web
site, since it's been retired it shouldn't be showing up in the list
of podlings and what not, and when I'm generating the site I can't
help but notice lots of changes in the
On 11/10/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If we go the first route, then we should treat this list as an
announcements list. Results of votes for releases and graduation are
posted here, and incubator PMC members will be given 72 hours to raise
an issue.
I've been advising podlings with
On 11/10/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
18. Lucene4c:
Mentors:Erik Hatcher
Started:Unknown
Incomplete: All
Diversity: Unknown
Releases: Unknown
Also FWIW, this one has been retired, I just hadn't updated its status
page to note that fact.
So, I'm trying to finish off the job of removing lucene4c from the web
site, since it's been retired it shouldn't be showing up in the list
of podlings and what not, and when I'm generating the site I can't
help but notice lots of changes in there that are totally unrelated to
what I just changed.
On 11/10/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. Abdera:
Mentors:Garrett Rooney, Paul Querna
Started:July 2006
Incomplete: Identification, Interim Responsibility, Copyright
Diversity: Unknown
Releases: Unknown
FWIW, when Ken pointed out to me th
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> There seems to be a persistent delusion that
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is where incubation happens.
>
> That is perjorative. Want to start again?
I just spent a considerable amount of time going through
all the podling status pages, and there's a certain
The vote for the OFBiz podling Test Snapshot Release 4.0.0 TS5 has
passed:
+1: 3: Robert Burrell Donkin, Yoav Shapira, David Welton
+0: 0
-1: 0
Being a Test Snapshot release we don't plan to "market" this
publicly, so we plan to end the process for this release with the
result of this vo
On 11/10/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Top three reasons why a project should join the ASF
>
> 1. A development community shares our core values of collaboration,
> transparency, and responsiblity.
Yes. But a project hosted at say Sourceforge can share those values
equally (or
Top three reasons why a project should join the ASF
1. A development community shares our core values of collaboration,
transparency, and responsiblity.
Yes. But a project hosted at say Sourceforge can share those values
equally (or sometimes even better imo, as they don't have to cope with
pol
On Nov 10, 2006, at 7:18 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
There seems to be a persistent delusion that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is where incubation happens. The
reality is that all the real incubating happens on the PPMC private
and dev lists.
We can correct this in one of two ways: recognize what actually
On the incubator site, we mention the How, Who, and When of
incubation. I thought we might also want to discuss the "Why".
Toward that end, here's my own short list of reason why projects
should, or should not, apply for incubation.
Top three reasons why a project should join the ASF
1. A deve
+1 from me.
-- dims
On 11/10/06, J Aaron Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/6/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread
> becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with the vote that was
> begun at
> http://ww
Hi,
On 11/10/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Personally, when I'm voting with my Incubator PMC hat on, I'm voting
based on the fact that the project has followed the ASF guidelines for
how to prepare and vote on a release, and that we've legally speaking
got all our ducks in a row
On 11/10/06, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday November 10 2006 11:06 am, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> I mean at the very least I would expect to see +1 votes from the
> project mentors as soon as the vote thread starts on
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], since at least in theory if there was anyth
Sam Ruby wrote:
>> I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread
>> becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with the vote that was
>> begun at
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11201.html
>> which contains some issues raised and comments
On 11/10/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Garrett raises a point about which I want to ask.
What criteria should a mentor use when it comes to
voting on a release? I for one can't make any
judgement of its technical worth..
Th
On 11/10/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Garrett raises a point about which I want to ask.
What criteria should a mentor use when it comes to
voting on a release? I for one can't make any
judgement of its technical worth..
Personally, when I'm voting with my Incubator PM
On Friday November 10 2006 11:06 am, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> I mean at the very least I would expect to see +1 votes from the
> project mentors as soon as the vote thread starts on
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], since at least in theory if there was anything that
> would keep them from voting +1 they would h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> There seems to be a persistent delusion that [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> is where incubation happens.
>
> That is perjorative. Want to start again?
What the flying moose ears is wrong with people today?
Every
I did notice that other pages had changed, but I figured that it had
happened as part of the site generation process.
I followed the procedure outlined:
Updated my copy of the repository.
Changed the single source file I was asked to update.
Generated the site using build.bat.
Ran build.bat fix t
On 11/10/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/10/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There seems to be a persistent delusion that [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> is where incubation happens. The reality is that all the real
> incubating happens on the PPMC private and dev lists.
>
> We
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Garrett raises a point about which I want to ask.
What criteria should a mentor use when it comes to
voting on a release? I for one can't make any
judgement of its technical worth..
- --
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
There seems to be a persistent delusion that [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is where incubation happens.
That is perjorative.
Indeed. It is rather rare to see such from me, wouldn't you say?
Perhaps I feel rather strongly about the current state of this ever
bur
On 11/10/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I mean at the very least I would expect to see +1 votes from the
project mentors as soon as the vote thread starts on
[EMAIL PROTECTED], since at least in theory if there was anything that
would keep them from voting +1 they would have raised
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=473365
> updated qpid status page
And did you not notice that you had changed many pages, which you had no
business changing?
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Sam Ruby wrote:
> There seems to be a persistent delusion that [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> is where incubation happens.
That is perjorative. Want to start again?
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addit
On 11/10/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There seems to be a persistent delusion that [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is where incubation happens. The reality is that all the real
incubating happens on the PPMC private and dev lists.
We can correct this in one of two ways: recognize what actually is
On 11/6/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread
becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with the vote that was
begun at
http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11201.html
which contains some i
On Nov 10, 2006, at 10:18 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
There seems to be a persistent delusion that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is where incubation happens. The
reality is that all the real incubating happens on the PPMC private
and dev lists.
We can correct this in one of two ways: recognize what actuall
There seems to be a persistent delusion that [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is where incubation happens. The reality is that all the real
incubating happens on the PPMC private and dev lists.
We can correct this in one of two ways: recognize what actually is
happening, or make what we say is happening act
I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread
becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with the vote that was
begun at
http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11201.html
which contains some issues raised and comments to address each of those
issu
Passed with PPMC +1s from jboynes, rfeng, kwilliams, svkrish, jmarino,
antelder, meerajk, kelvingoodson, rineholt, isilval, dkulp, ajborley,
robbinspg
and +1s from Adriano Crestani
and no -1s
Welcome to the project Luciano, sorry for the delay in wrapping this vote up.
--
Jeremy
On 10/26/06, Je
38 matches
Mail list logo
