Re: [Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: [IVY] setup of infrastructure]

2006-10-30 Thread Xavier Hanin
On 10/31/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FYI Original Message Subject:Re: Fwd: Re: [IVY] setup of infrastructure Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:35:58 +1100 From: Jeff Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC:

Re: [IVY] setup of infrastructure

2006-10-30 Thread Xavier Hanin
On 10/30/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 31/10/06, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Personnally I don't mind, What I like with only one list is that you can > easily reply to a commit and discuss it if required. Having two separate > lists is more "scalable". If any other

Re: [IVY] setup of infrastructure

2006-10-30 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You don't need to bother infrastructure with svn issues, BTW, I > should be able to handle that. Just found out that I cannot create the initial directory - and didn't want to grant myself the right to do so, either. Stefan --

Re: [IVY] setup of infrastructure

2006-10-30 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, can I request the creation of the svn directory for ivy before > the grant is received, or shall I wait for this one ? No, we just must not import any code before the grant is recorded. You don't need to bother infrastr

Re: voting was Re: [PROPOSAL] Ivy

2006-10-30 Thread Craig L Russell
I wonder (out loud) if we might recommend to change the format of the [RESULT] [VOTE] tally to simply summarize the binding votes, just for completeness. Clearly, the people who need to know who the binding votes are already know it, and it doesn't strike folks quite in the face if they are

[Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: [IVY] setup of infrastructure]

2006-10-30 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
FYI Original Message Subject:Re: Fwd: Re: [IVY] setup of infrastructure Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:35:58 +1100 From: Jeff Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: <[EMAIL PR

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveMQ 4.0.2 (RC 6)

2006-10-30 Thread Dhawan, Vikram \(LNG-DAY\)
Hi Hiram, I am still having trouble with message selector using STOMP C. it works fine in the 4.0.1 release. Thanks! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hiram Chirino Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 9:54 PM To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.o

Re: New Name for UIMA Podling?

2006-10-30 Thread eddie_epstein
Marshall, Please use the address [EMAIL PROTECTED] for Apache stuff rather than [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Eddie >Ken was the one really pushing for a new name, but he seems to have >accepted that the community is fine with keeping the old name. > >-Marshall > > Original Message

Re: [IVY] setup of infrastructure

2006-10-30 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hello Xavier, we need to check with infrastructure whether they accept new products in JIRA at this time. I understood that infrastructure has more trouble supporting JIRA than Bugzilla. I will ask infrastructure in a separate email. Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum

Re: [IVY] setup of infrastructure

2006-10-30 Thread Brett Porter
On 31/10/06, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Personnally I don't mind, What I like with only one list is that you can easily reply to a commit and discuss it if required. Having two separate lists is more "scalable". If any other one has a preference, it's ok for me. We set the reply-to

Re: [IVY] setup of infrastructure

2006-10-30 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Thanks Garrett, this is fixed in Subversion, and the change will be soon visible on the web. Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:50:42 -0500 Von: "Garrett Rooney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: general@incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: [IVY] setup of infrast

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveMQ 4.0.2 (RC 6)

2006-10-30 Thread Adrian Co
Wonder if we can include this: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1015 So people would be able to run the webapps. Otherwise, if its not a big deal, here's my +1. :) James Strachan wrote: +1 On 10/30/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Some last minute NOTICE issues were

Re: [IVY] setup of infrastructure

2006-10-30 Thread Xavier Hanin
On 10/30/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Upayavira, Hi Antoine, thanks a lot for your email. The status page exists at this location : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ivy.html Xavier already answered that he is working on the software grant. Can all the int

Re: New Name for UIMA Podling?

2006-10-30 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marshall Schor wrote: > Based on information in the notes about the Braintree proposal, I used > the service at the US Patent and Trademark office to look up UIMA - it > generates no "hits". "Honu" (one of the alternative names earlier > proposed)

Re: [IVY] setup of infrastructure

2006-10-30 Thread Garrett Rooney
On 10/30/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Some projects call their ppmc list private (for instance would be ivy-private). Do we have to obey to this convention ? All the PMC and PPMC mailing lists are now known as -private, to stress the fact that they're supposed to be use

[IVY] setup of infrastructure

2006-10-30 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hello Upayavira, thanks a lot for your email. The status page exists at this location : http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ivy.html Xavier already answered that he is working on the software grant. Can all the interested parties (champions, mentors, and of course Xavier and Maarten) check th

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ivy

2006-10-30 Thread Xavier Hanin
On 10/30/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I am not familiar with the legal aspects of bringing an external codebase to the incubator. William Rowe wrote that jayasoft needs to fill in a software grant to the ASF. Ok I'll fill and send a software grant tomorrow morning

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ivy

2006-10-30 Thread Upayavira
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi, I am not familiar with the legal aspects of bringing an external codebase to the incubator. William Rowe wrote that jayasoft needs to fill in a software grant to the ASF. If this is right, the software grant must be received and accepted before setting up the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ivy

2006-10-30 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hi, I am not familiar with the legal aspects of bringing an external codebase to the incubator. William Rowe wrote that jayasoft needs to fill in a software grant to the ASF. If this is right, the software grant must be received and accepted before setting up the infrastructure (svn, mailing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ActiveMQ 4.0.2 (RC 6)

2006-10-30 Thread James Strachan
+1 On 10/30/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Some last minute NOTICE issues were still present in the 5th release candidate of the 4.0.2 build. We have also received confirmation from Apache legal discuss that it's ok to include work covered by the "Creative Commons Attribution" lic

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ivy

2006-10-30 Thread Xavier Hanin
On 10/30/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I have updated the incubator web site. The changes should be visible within an hour. Ivy should then be visible in the Projects bar to the right of the site. Great, I can see Ivy project page! I've tried to register to the mail

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ivy

2006-10-30 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hi, I have updated the incubator web site. The changes should be visible within an hour. Ivy should then be visible in the Projects bar to the right of the site. Regards, Antoine Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > Garrett Rooney wrote: > >> Ahh, sorry, my bad. If you're already an ASF Member you