Brett,
Am not sure that the last point will fly with the board :)
Yes, i'd be worried too :) [*if the WS PMC had vetted and voted and
still produced the same proposal*]
+1 to base web site content around the questions like you mentioned.
Can you please help write them up?
The worries that i see
Sure, but your last point (having the incubator also approve an
external project coming to a PMC) was designed to take care of that.
I agree, it worked well with Tuscany. However, in some cases it makes
more sense for a PMC to get their house in order first. As long as
everybody gets involved befo
Brett,
Let's take Tuscany, If the WS PMC had voted on the proposal before it
hit [EMAIL PROTECTED], it would have probably passed the pmc VOTE. and
incubator would have had to accept it as-is. however fortunately, the
proposal was sent directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Roy (and others) had quite
Some thoughts:
# [ ] - Any proposal should hit [EMAIL PROTECTED] first, No PR before that.
# [ ] - Any PR should be vetted by PRC, No Excuses.
Agree, for the Apache side of things. I'm not sure we can stop
companies doing what they are going to do, but we can certainly say
that that they shouldn'
> http://people.apache.org/~jerenkrantz/ForrestCoatSafari.jpg
I believe that this may be the known issue, but none of the menu on the left
hand side is visible. Instead, I get an error, which says:
Line 15
Char 1
Error: Object expected
Code: 0
URL: http://people.apache.org/~rgardler/te
On 1/2/2006 10:20 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
There are plenty of non-JCP specs, e.g. CORBA.
Do they have the same kind of "independent artifacts" like some of
these JCP specs do? I've been thinking about this too - what other
specs have a similar kind of m
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
There are plenty of non-JCP specs, e.g. CORBA.
Do they have the same kind of "independent artifacts" like some of these
JCP specs do? I've been thinking about this too - what other specs have
a similar kind of mechanism?
geir
-
Henri Yandell wrote:
On 12/31/05, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't been involved in any history here, so please forgive my naivete.
I think I understand the rationale for developing spec jars here at Apache.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. In order to use a spec jar from
On 1/1/2006 5:23 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 12/31/05, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't been involved in any history here, so please forgive my naivete.
I think I understand the rationale for developing spec jars here at Apache.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. In order t
On Jan 1, 2006, at 10:45 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:I've been wanting to create a skin for Forrest that looks like that at http://www.apache.org for some time. Mostly because the default Forrest skins are, well "old".The recent thread here discussing Forrest as a tool has finally prompted me into actio
--On January 2, 2006 12:57:41 PM + Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Seems to have the same issue w/ IE 6 and Firefox 1.5 on WinXP
Really?
I don't see the problem on windows XP, IE or Firefox.
Firefox on Mac OS X has the same issue (albeit only with
me likes.
On Jan 1, 2006, at 8:36 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I realize that many might have checked-out of this thread about 200
messages ago... if there's any interest or comment...
(Note, this is just an experiment)
Original Message
Subject: Re: [RT] Super Simple S
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Seems to have the same issue w/ IE 6 and Firefox 1.5 on WinXP
Really?
I don't see the problem on windows XP, IE or Firefox.
I'm guessing you are referring to the project logo, that does look like
it is clipped. I've just upload the incubator logo in its place.
David Crossley wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I don't see any point in having this conversation every year.
Whoever is willing to fix the content on incubator, please feel
free to remove the entire site (except the project status files)
and start over with whatever t
Seems to have the same issue w/ IE 6 and Firefox 1.5 on WinXP
geir
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 06:45:56AM +, Ross Gardler wrote:
It is not (yet) a perfect copy of the main ASF site. We still need some
work on the finer details. However, I hope this is enough to gi
15 matches
Mail list logo
