On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Jay Zylstra wrote:
> 4) Start an LGPL-like project where many share in the free creation
> and use of the artwork
>
> Artwork project (http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/artwork), the Apache
> Gallery project would be licensed under Apache's more liberal LGPL-like
You n
I've used Apache code throughout my products for years, including JServ
and Tomcat, Xerces and Xalan, SOAP, Log4J, some Xang, and now Struts.
Apache has saved me countless hours of effort, for which I've tried to
repay Apache by helping where I can. However, there is one common
component to my pro
Jeremy,
I agree entirely. Pretty much everything you just said is part of the
current discussion. Not sure why it is happening on the PMC mailing list,
other than that no one moved it, since there is really nothing sensitive
being discussed, just options for how to better structure oversight.
I
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Steven Noels wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
[ context not fully acquired ]
s/Lenya/Geronimo/
As you know, we are discussing some options related to this topic. One
would be that for a given subproject, we would have
[EMAIL PROTECTED], where the members of that list c
Steven Noels wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> > The Incubator should try to minimize cross-votes, as they have shown
> > in practice to be very confusing and not productive.
> >
> > I don't like this Mentor+Lenya+IncubatorPMC double vote either. The
> > alternative is to have all Lenya committ
Steven Noels wrote:
The discussion on cocoon/incubator PMC lists was about whether the
Incubator PMC rather than the receiving PMC or mentors should vote for
an incubatee release. Nicola suggested that we should discuss this on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pardon me for eventual context loss. Here it goes:
On Wednesday, November 19, 2003, an inconsistency was noted in the
Geronimo CVS, and thus it was taken offline for examination. Once all
data was captured and a cursory examination was made, it was determined
that the CVS repository was able to be returned to public access.
The issue was th
The discussion on cocoon/incubator PMC lists was about whether the
Incubator PMC rather than the receiving PMC or mentors should vote for
an incubatee release. Nicola suggested that we should discuss this on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pardon me for eventual context loss. Here it goes:
--
robert burrell donkin wrote:
jochen's recent announcement set me thinking about where the right place
for announcements like this. general's a cool place but should it also
go to announcements at ws?
If ws wants, it's ok for me, as long as they include the usual
disclaimer in the message.
Th
