On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Jay Zylstra wrote:
> 4) Start an LGPL-like project where many share in the free creation > and use of the artwork > > Artwork project (http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/artwork), the Apache > Gallery project would be licensed under Apache's more liberal LGPL-like You need to research the licencing a bit. The Apache licence is far more libreral than LGPL. There have been questions on LGPL's validity for something like Java, it's validity for something like images would seem non existent. Possibly you might want to consider the various documentation licences. They may be a better fit than the source code licences like the ASF licence. [OT: It does raise interesting questions over the licencing of Apache documentation and images] > license, which wouldn't force me to open-source my work, and thus > destroy my livelihood. Once incubated, I'm not sure if it would best > belong under Commons or Jakarta. Wherever it would land, it would Definitely not Jakarta. It's nothing to do with Java. Equally, it's pushing it as to whether it's to do with Commons as it's not something that is coming from the Apache commiting community [ie) another Apache project]. Whether artwork is something that fits in the Apache realm, I'll leave for others to argue over. I see no blatant reason why it could not. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
