On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is there anything to prevent gump builds being set up for incubating
> projects?
>
> (other than actually doing the work, of course ;)
This last one is probably the biggest obstacle, as whoever does the
work needs to be at l
The Geronimo committers recently (9/15) voted to give commit to Aaron Mulder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and Alan Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] I
have sent several emails to the Incubator PMC and to members directly but
have not received any reply.
Are we in the process of sorting out their access? If not, what
> From: Ted Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 1. Create a forrest xml source for the Incubation Musings and place
> > onto web site. This will require an OK from who? (PMC?)
> >
> If you're willing to do the work for this, that's fine, but I don't see
> a forrest-enabled version as a requiremen
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2003/09/17 13:22:24 $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://Nagoya.Apache.Org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ApacheIncubatorProjectPages
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documenta
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sometimes a sponsor or a shepherd has to act fast and remove from CVS
> things that are not correct, like licensing. Or simply to give a hand,
> always about incubation things.
>
> I don't find it inconsistent with meritrocracy, as they should be
On Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:23 AM, Berin Lautenbach wrote:
> Cliff,
>
> Firstly - thanks for all the thoughts. Great stuff! (I think.
> Grumble grumble, more work, mutter mutter :>)
>
> You are more than welcome to update anything in the document you so
> desire. However that's not a
Dear PMC Members,
where does jUDDI proposal stand?
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10638228535&r=1&w=2)
Thanks,
dims
=
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
I'm a senior engineer who's very experienced with Java and J2EE server
implementations. I was the architect behind BroadVision's Servlet and JSP
container. I'd be interested in working on Geronimo(part time), if you
have stuff for me to work on.
I've attached a copy of my resume in case you
> > formally. Probably the first thing in the policy reference should be
> > rules for modifying the policy. :>.
>
>
> Please, please, don't do that!
> Your describing meta policy (the rules modifying policy) - that is
> another subject with a different set of concerns and should be
> d
> From: "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Who chooses the members of the incubator PMC? I know anyone can vote
> > for anything, but who gets binding votes?
>
> The PMC members of the Incubator PMC vote on new members of said PMC.
> The Board signs off on any PMC changes (for all PMCs).
> From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 11:46 PM
> Who chooses the members of the incubator PMC? I know anyone can vote
> for anything, but who gets binding votes?
The PMC members of the Incubator PMC vote on new members of said PMC.
The Board signs
> is there anything to prevent gump builds being set up for incubating
> projects?
>
> (other than actually doing the work, of course ;)
If you are asking -- could incubator projects be gump'ed, then sure -- the
great resources in the sky willing. ;-) If you are asking ought such young
projects b
Who chooses the members of the incubator PMC? I know anyone can vote
for anything, but who gets binding votes?
Is is committers on projects in the incubator, any committer at Apache,
just Apache Members, or the Apache Board of Directors?
I hope this is a simple question.
Thanks,
-dain
/*
Stephen McConnell wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
is there anything to prevent gump builds being set up for incubating
projects?
(other than actually doing the work, of course ;)
Only the idea of using of getting JIRA settup here at Apache and using
it instead.
Retruaction retrac
robert burrell donkin wrote:
is there anything to prevent gump builds being set up for incubating
projects?
(other than actually doing the work, of course ;)
Only the idea of using of getting JIRA settup here at Apache and using
it instead.
Stephen.
--
Stephen J. McConnell
mailto:[EMAIL
robert burrell donkin wrote:
is there anything to prevent gump builds being set up for incubating
projects?
nope!
- Leo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is there anything to prevent gump builds being set up for incubating
projects?
(other than actually doing the work, of course ;)
- robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
On 9/24/2003 4:21 AM, Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Peoples,
I think in Incubator Musings we have a good first cut at a "process
description" for Incubation. This is a non-normative reference that I
think could be put on the web site, subject to everyone being
comfortable with the contents.
On top
Berin:
Total agree with your comments and suggestions you provided in response
to Cliff.
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Cliff,
Firstly - thanks for all the thoughts. Great stuff!
Totally !!
Feedback is really helpfull. The detail and obviouse attention to
content is exactly the sort of thing we
Berin:
Other commens on the email later - just need to jump in on this one point.
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
2. Create a table of contents for the policy reference document.
This can be started on Wiki (and I will do a first cut over the next
few days), but I think we are getting to a point whe
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
> Cliff,
Firstly - thanks for all the thoughts. Great stuff! (I think. Grumble
grumble, more work, mutter mutter :>)
Hehehe, you write stuff too well ;-)
...
* "On acceptance of a candidate project, the assigned Shepherd and
nominated Sponsor shall be added to the set of
Cliff,
Firstly - thanks for all the thoughts. Great stuff! (I think. Grumble
grumble, more work, mutter mutter :>)
You are more than welcome to update anything in the document you so
desire. However that's not a hint - am happy to (and will tomorrow)
take all this on board and make the cha
Peoples,
I think in Incubator Musings we have a good first cut at a "process
description" for Incubation. This is a non-normative reference that I
think could be put on the web site, subject to everyone being
comfortable with the contents.
On top of that, we need to try to put a concrete plan
On Tuesday, September 23, 2003 5:29 AM, Berin Lautenbach wrote:
> Would be great if you could have a read through the new version of
>
> http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?IncubatorMussings
I also think this is a very well-written and extremely useful document.
Below are a few notes/
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
I've put something slightly different into the IncubatorMussings
document. I've said that the Incubator PMC *recommends* to the
Sponsoring Entity (the receiving PMC) that something has completed,
needs to continue or fails.
no, i don't th
On Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:26 PM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> >Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> >
>>> while they are in the Incubator, they must ensure these releases are
>>> clearly labeled as being incubator releases, which are not fully
>>> endorsed by the ASF
>>
>>>
Craig wrote:
>Off the top of my head ... advantages include:
IMO you missed out "Your own PMC and charter" These two things represent a
quantum difference in the management of a TLP c.f a jakarta sub-project, as
the bring with them the ability (within the restrictions of "The Apache
Way"
On Wednesday, September 24, 2003 12:59 AM, Danny Angus wrote:
> Is there a contributors licence which can be signed by an employer on
> behalf of a commiter who's IP is generally assigned to their employer?
> I have an agreement with my employer, but would much rather that they
> made the agreemen
Hi,
Is there a contributors licence which can be signed by an employer on
behalf of a commiter who's IP is generally assigned to their employer?
I have an agreement with my employer, but would much rather that they made
the agreement with the ASF
Ted Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/09/2003 04:58:20 PM:
> On 9/23/2003 3:51 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
> > FWIW
> >
> > my experience at jakarta has been that momentum is much more important
> > than Releases. in fact, some of the most talked about new java
products
> > here a
30 matches
Mail list logo
