Nicola,
...
No change necessary.
...
As is happening presently.
Nope.
@see http://cocoon.apache.org/lenya/community/mailing-lists.html
No Incubator logo, no @incubator.apache.org mailing lists, no
reference to the incubation status.
I stand corrected.
> No need for vote?
These are sparse
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2003/04/18 16:01:44 $]
The Incubation Process
==
Identify the project to be incubated:
-- Make sure that the requested project name does not already exist
and check w
Paul Hammant wrote, On 09/07/2003 8.38:
Nicola,
As I told Steven some mails back, I understand the point. Hence I agree
with the incubator-projectname CVS module name and separate mailing
list(s) if the project is big enough (as I gather this is).
Here is a rewrite of those points:
...
No ch
On 7/8/03 5:31 AM, "Steven Noels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/07/2003 11:13 Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
>> 6. Making a separate mailing list right from the start that is in the
>> final destination address is again IMHO not a good idea. I would propose
>> that all incubating projects start
On 7/7/03 2:09 PM, "robert burrell donkin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> XMLBeans feels (to me) like a jakarta component but if xml are happy to
> manage it, i'd say that it'd probably work out easier that way. there isn'
> t any reason why XMLBeans couldn't be visible on the jakarta website and
