On 7/8/03 5:31 AM, "Steven Noels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/07/2003 11:13 Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > >> 6. Making a separate mailing list right from the start that is in the >> final destination address is again IMHO not a good idea. I would propose >> that all incubating projects start de-facto on the >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ML, and eventually migrate to >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -1: Providing isolated resources makes it much easier to zap stuff upon > incubation failure. Also, if both -user, -dev, and -cvs mails > originating from several incubating projects would be aggregated onto a > single set of incubation- lists, I'm pretty sure people would be very > quickly annoyed. > Agree with Steven on the mailing list, disagree on the cvs module. I think these things should be case by case. Tapestry, for instance, had a lot less issues of its own than XMLBeans and Apache had a lot more issues surrounding the incubator creation therefore we created the CVS module... In the XMLBeans case, there are a lot more community issues and a lot less Apache issues, therefore a cvs dir makes more sense. Aggregating everything on one big fat mailing list always turns out to be a huge pain. Its much easier to organize one's mail based on mail list than any voluntary [tag] system. -Andy > Other than that: enthusiastic +0.75. > > </Steven> -- Andrew C. Oliver http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI http://jakarta.apache.org/poi For Java and Excel, Got POI? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
