On 11/22/2010 10:50 PM, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
Howard Butler wrote:
As long as we're approving (slightly) painful RFCs, what are people's
thoughts on installing GDAL's includes by default in a
number-prefixed directory instead of in the global directory?
For example, instead of installing in /
Howard Butler wrote:
As long as we're approving (slightly) painful RFCs, what are people's thoughts on installing GDAL's includes by default in a number-prefixed directory instead of in the global directory?
For example, instead of installing in
/usr/local/include/gdal.h
for GDAL 1.8, we'd i
On Nov 22, 2010, at 1:54 PM, Daniel Morissette wrote:
> Frank Warmerdam wrote:
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I haven't seen any serious concerns with proceeding with this fix and I
>> have incorporated a few fixes. So now I'd like to motion to adopt RFC 33:
>>
>> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc33_g
Frank Warmerdam wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I haven't seen any serious concerns with proceeding with this fix and I
> have incorporated a few fixes. So now I'd like to motion to adopt RFC 33:
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc33_gtiff_pixelispoint
>
I have to admit that it took me a few read
Folks,
I haven't seen any serious concerns with proceeding with this fix and I
have incorporated a few fixes. So now I'd like to motion to adopt RFC 33:
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc33_gtiff_pixelispoint
+1 Frank
Best regards,
--
---+--
