On Nov 22, 2010, at 1:54 PM, Daniel Morissette wrote: > Frank Warmerdam wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> I haven't seen any serious concerns with proceeding with this fix and I >> have incorporated a few fixes. So now I'd like to motion to adopt RFC 33: >> >> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc33_gtiff_pixelispoint >> > > I have to admit that it took me a few reads to (kind of) realize the > implications this rfc, but since this is about aligning GDAL with the > GeoTiff spec I think we have to bite the bullet and do it. > > +1
+1 As long as we're approving (slightly) painful RFCs, what are people's thoughts on installing GDAL's includes by default in a number-prefixed directory instead of in the global directory? For example, instead of installing in /usr/local/include/gdal.h for GDAL 1.8, we'd install in /usr/local/include/gdal18/gdal.h Do we need an RFC for this? Howard _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
