Re: [gdal-dev] osx compile failure

2019-01-17 Thread Alan Stewart
Thanks, Ivan, that's very helpful. I found that the .so files in gdal/swig/python/build/lib.macosx-10.12-x86_64-2.7/osgeo/ are reference /usr/local/lib, while gdal/apps/.libs/gdalinfo references ~/install-gdal/lib/. This is so even after a fresh git clone. That explains why pytest is not w

Re: [gdal-dev] RFC 73 (aka gdalsrsbarn) available for review

2019-01-17 Thread Even Rouault
> I guess this just sounds like a development/test issue rather than > something that should be exposed for users. Mostly. But I can imagine it can be also useful for people tracking GDAL master in production, but not wanting to rebuild their whole GIS stack. Beyond time and pain to do it, updat

Re: [gdal-dev] RFC 73 (aka gdalsrsbarn) available for review

2019-01-17 Thread Andrew Bell
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:09 PM Even Rouault wrote: > On jeudi 17 janvier 2019 13:45:27 CET Andrew Bell wrote: > > What is the logic behind the PROJ symbol renaming? > > First, it is purely optional and require active decision of the user to > build > PROJ that way. This is only meant to be used

Re: [gdal-dev] RFC 73 (aka gdalsrsbarn) available for review

2019-01-17 Thread Even Rouault
On jeudi 17 janvier 2019 13:45:27 CET Andrew Bell wrote: > What is the logic behind the PROJ symbol renaming? First, it is purely optional and require active decision of the user to build PROJ that way. This is only meant to be used by people wanting to mix GDAL master + PROJ master + GDAL depe

Re: [gdal-dev] RFC 73 (aka gdalsrsbarn) available for review

2019-01-17 Thread Andrew Bell
What is the logic behind the PROJ symbol renaming? I remember terrible things about previous symbol renaming efforts. Is the expectation that PROJ will be statically linked in GDAL for some reason? On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 1:27 PM Even Rouault wrote: > On lundi 14 janvier 2019 12:42:08 CET Even

Re: [gdal-dev] RFC 73 (aka gdalsrsbarn) available for review

2019-01-17 Thread Even Rouault
On lundi 14 janvier 2019 12:42:08 CET Even Rouault wrote: > On mercredi 9 janvier 2019 16:23:44 CET Even Rouault wrote: > > Hi, > > > > RFC 73 "Integration of PROJ6 for WKT2, late binding capabilities, > > time-support and unified CRS database" is available for your review at: > > > > https://tra

Re: [gdal-dev] vector representation in netcdf 4

2019-01-17 Thread Emilio Mayorga
FYI, until recently representation of vector geometries in netCDF-CF has not been standardized. But there's a mature proposal/spec in place for "simple geometries" that's close to being officially adopted by CF. See: https://github.com/twhiteaker/netCDF-CF-simple-geometry https://cf-trac.llnl.gov/t