What is the logic behind the PROJ symbol renaming? I remember terrible things about previous symbol renaming efforts. Is the expectation that PROJ will be statically linked in GDAL for some reason?
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 1:27 PM Even Rouault <even.roua...@spatialys.com> wrote: > On lundi 14 janvier 2019 12:42:08 CET Even Rouault wrote: > > On mercredi 9 janvier 2019 16:23:44 CET Even Rouault wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > RFC 73 "Integration of PROJ6 for WKT2, late binding capabilities, > > > time-support and unified CRS database" is available for your review at: > > > > > > https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc73_proj6_wkt2_srsbarn > > > > No remarks ? Do people need a bit more time to review ? > > I intend to submit it to voting beginning of next week. Last chance for > expressing your remarks. > > Even > > -- > Spatialys - Geospatial professional services > http://www.spatialys.com > _______________________________________________ > gdal-dev mailing list > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev -- Andrew Bell andrew.bell...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
