2014-05-20 10:29 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault :
> Is it new to the -dev version ? I don't think so, but anyway, feel free to
> change the error into a CPLDebug message. The error seems to be emitted there
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/browser/trunk/gdal/ogr/ogrsf_frmts/pg/ogrpgtablelayer.cpp#L380
no, it'
Le mardi 20 mai 2014 18:18:37, David Fawcett a écrit :
> As usual Even, spot on!
>
> Thank you for precise diagnosis and the quick solution. My project is back
> on track and the product can be delivered soon. I am guessing that I could
> bump the pool_size up somewhat. I plan to play around wi
Le mardi 20 mai 2014 02:22:12, Stephen Woodbridge a écrit :
> Even,
>
> Thanks!
>
> I didn't set his up, I just inherited the maintenance of it and I'm just
> trying to understand how it works and eventually make changes to it and
> fix some of the processing that does not seem to be grounded in
As usual Even, spot on!
Thank you for precise diagnosis and the quick solution. My project is back
on track and the product can be delivered soon. I am guessing that I could
bump the pool_size up somewhat. I plan to play around with that value and
maybe get a little more performance (on my old
On 20 May 2014 17:29, Even Rouault wrote:
> Selon Mateusz :
>
>> AFAIU, this voting request targets PSC members [1] only.
>> Or, does it target the whole community?
>>
>> [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/GovernanceAndCommunity
>
> Mateusz,
>
> Officially, only votes from PSC members is taken i
Selon Mateusz :
> AFAIU, this voting request targets PSC members [1] only.
> Or, does it target the whole community?
>
> [1] http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/GovernanceAndCommunity
Mateusz,
Officially, only votes from PSC members is taken into account, so as it remains
manageable (e.g. if a rand
AFAIU, this voting request targets PSC members [1] only.
Or, does it target the whole community?
[1] http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/GovernanceAndCommunity
Mateusz
On 20 May 2014 15:43, xavier lhomme wrote:
> +1
> xl
>
>
> 2014-05-20 14:49 GMT+02:00 Daniel Morissette :
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Daniel
>>
+1
xl
2014-05-20 14:49 GMT+02:00 Daniel Morissette :
> +1
>
> Daniel
>
>
> On 14-05-19 4:29 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered. I've
>> just
>> done a minor edit to the RFC text to mention RFC 36, as rightly suggested
>> by
+1
Daniel
On 14-05-19 4:29 PM, Even Rouault wrote:
Hi,
I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered. I've just
done a minor edit to the RFC text to mention RFC 36, as rightly suggested by
Ivan.
So:
Motion : I move to adopt RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification
http://tra
Thanks Peter, Carl, Even, Jukka et al for this interesting discussion on adding
Georeferencing to image file standards, and capabilities of GMLJP2 2.0 (and its
GMLCOV capabilities for rectified Grid coverages or Georeferenceable Grid
coverages), GeoJP2 ...
I appreciate this idea and action from
Peter, Carl et al
For the sake of clarification, I'd like to know in the " this includes GMLCOV
and WCS." What does the "this" relates to ? (GMLJP2 ?, OGC/ISO discussion ?
both ?
Moreover, I believe WCS is not directly related (or included) ... IMHO, the
relationship between WCS (Web coverage Se
Selon Guillaume Pasero :
> Hi Even,
>
> Le 19/05/2014 20:01, Even Rouault a écrit :
> > Guillaume,
> >
> >> I am using the OpenJPEG driver from GDAL and I noticed some differences
> >> with the behaviour of an other OpenJPEG "driver" that I used before in
> >> the library Orfeo ToolBox. The GDAL
SAVINAUD Mickaël c-s.fr> writes:
> > IMHO the test case seems to be a bit too artificial to justify any change,
> > unless there are real world cases where that would cause issues.
> >
> Yes it is not a real case but it is a conformance data which allow to
> define if a decoder is JPEG decodi
Mickaël,
> >
> >> * The size of the overview at level 'n' is computed as : ovr_size =
> >> raster_size / 2^n , whereas it should be ovr_size = ceil(
> >> raster_size / float(2^n) )
> >>
> >
> > Hum, any reason to particularly round to the upper value rather than
> > the lower
> > value ?
Hi Even,
Le 19/05/2014 20:01, Even Rouault a écrit :
Guillaume,
I am using the OpenJPEG driver from GDAL and I noticed some differences
with the behaviour of an other OpenJPEG "driver" that I used before in
the library Orfeo ToolBox. The GDAL driver fails to pass a conformance
test : using the
Hello,
I tried to compile GDAL 1.11.0 with the meteosat 2 (MSG) driver, but
compilation failed in
frmts/msg/msgcommand.cpp
with a message stating that sprintf() was unknown. Adding
#include
at the top of the file fixed the problem. A trivial patch is attached; I
release it under the licen
Selon David Fawcett :
> I am using gdal_translate and a .vrt to take 115 .jp2 files from the USGS,
> pull them together and then export a lower resolution .jp2.
>
> This is with GDAL 1.10 on OSX.
> gdalinfo --version
> GDAL 1.10.1, released 2013/08/26
>
> When I run gdal_translate, it gets about 3
Selon Martin Landa :
> Hi all,
>
> sample script to reproduce:
>
> """
> from osgeo import ogr
>
> odrv = ogr.GetDriverByName("PostgreSQL")
> ods = odrv.Open("PG:dbname=pgis_vfr", True)
> layerName = 'obce'
> if not ods.GetLayerByName(layerName):
> print "Layer not found, creating..."
> od
Hi all,
sample script to reproduce:
"""
from osgeo import ogr
odrv = ogr.GetDriverByName("PostgreSQL")
ods = odrv.Open("PG:dbname=pgis_vfr", True)
layerName = 'obce'
if not ods.GetLayerByName(layerName):
print "Layer not found, creating..."
ods.CreateLayer(layerName, None, ogr.wkbPoint,
Following to my previous message, the host value seems to be not specified.
COuld you tell me how i can specified this host value in order to load
postgis raster ?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/qgis-2-2-gdal-error-message-for-display-postgis-r
On 05/19/2014 10:50 PM, Carl Reed wrote:
Thanks, Peter.
Also, FYI, version 2 of the OGC GML in JP2000 (GMLJP2) candidate standard is
in an OGC adoption vote until June 29. There is also an OGC/ISO discussion
this week as to whether this OGC standards should also become an ISO standard.
Just
21 matches
Mail list logo
