SAVINAUD Mickaël <mickael.savinaud <at> c-s.fr> writes:
> > IMHO the test case seems to be a bit too artificial to justify any change, > > unless there are real world cases where that would cause issues. > > > Yes it is not a real case but it is a conformance data which allow to > define if a decoder is JPEG decoding compliant. It helps to verify > that real less complicated case will be handled properly. For example > we can see that JP2ECW is not compliant about this point. Is it a right place to run such tests with GDAL? I understand that JPEG2000 SDKs should pass the tests but isn't GDAL working one step further when it is utilizing the data ripped off the j2k codestreams? -Jukka Rahkonen- _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
