Hi Mark,
Well done on the new patches they are currently being merged. I imagine the
typechecking could be a bit more complex since correct me if I am wrong but
I feel like this might end up affecting the whole PathInExpression
resolution which is fairly complicated. There is a nullptr bug there i
Hi Philip,
On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 02:23:33PM +0100, Philip Herron wrote:
> I've been reviewing your branch a bit and noticed this commit
> https://code.wildebeest.org/git/user/mjw/gccrs/commit/?h=enums&id=84d27b926e09ef44dd94be20c97d72bd4b865c40
> which I really like. I wasn't sure what was the b
Hi Mark,
I've been reviewing your branch a bit and noticed this commit
https://code.wildebeest.org/git/user/mjw/gccrs/commit/?h=enums&id=84d27b926e09ef44dd94be20c97d72bd4b865c40
which I really like. I wasn't sure what was the best way to interact with
the AST which contained unique_ptr's to things
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:11:46AM +0100, Philip Herron wrote:
> This is fantastic work Mar. This brings us closer to the AST structures of
> rustc and does simplify a lot of the analysis within the compiler.
> https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/expressions/struct-expr.html
The refer
This is fantastic work Mar. This brings us closer to the AST structures of
rustc and does simplify a lot of the analysis within the compiler.
https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/expressions/struct-expr.html
I agree the HIR cleanup will also help reduce a lot of duplication of code
and visi