Hi Mark,

Well done on the new patches they are currently being merged. I imagine the
typechecking could be a bit more complex since correct me if I am wrong but
I feel like this might end up affecting the whole PathInExpression
resolution which is fairly complicated. There is a nullptr bug there if it
fails to resolve the root segment.

I imagine there might need to be a check in the resolve_segments for if the
tyseg which will be the type of the previous segment, if that is an ADTType
which is an enum then look for the name of the field within the struct but
i am not 100% sure if it does affect the PathInExpression stuff.

Let me know if there is anything I can do to help or review? I don't mind
checking out your branches to play with too.

Thanks

--Phil
-- 
Gcc-rust mailing list
Gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-rust

Reply via email to