I will take a look.
On 20/06/25 07:16, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> Thanks for looking into this.
>
> Hi Adhemerval,
>
> Would you please look into how glibc should handle this?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Maxim Kuvyrkov
> https://www.linaro.org
>
>> On Jun 19, 2025, at 04:24, Sam James wro
Hi Sam,
Thanks for looking into this.
Hi Adhemerval,
Would you please look into how glibc should handle this?
Thanks!
--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
https://www.linaro.org
> On Jun 19, 2025, at 04:24, Sam James wrote:
>
> Could you file a glibc bug for this please? It needs some analysis to
> see if it'
Could you file a glibc bug for this please? It needs some analysis to
see if it's an FP or not.
There's actually a suppression for -Os already there:
if (elem < table_size)
{
/* Compare the byte sequence but
Dear contributor,
Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find
some details below.
In master-aarch64, after:
| commit gcc-16-1550-g9244ea4bf556
| Author: Andrew MacLeod
| Date: Mon Jun 16 15:41:47 2025 -0400
|
| Snap subrange boundries to bitma