Hi Sam, Thanks for looking into this.
Hi Adhemerval, Would you please look into how glibc should handle this? Thanks! -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Jun 19, 2025, at 04:24, Sam James <s...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Could you file a glibc bug for this please? It needs some analysis to > see if it's an FP or not. > > There's actually a suppression for -Os already there: > > if (elem < table_size) > { > /* Compare the byte sequence but only if > this is not part of a range. */ > > /* The compiler might warn that idx may be > used uninitialized, however it will be > reached iff elem < table_size which means > that it was properly set in the loop > above. */ > DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT; > DIAG_IGNORE_Os_NEEDS_COMMENT (8, > "-Wmaybe-uninitialized"); > if (! is_range > > # if WIDE_CHAR_VERSION > && __wmemcmp (n, &wextra[1], c1) == 0 > # else > && memcmp (n, &extra[idx + 1], c1) == 0 > # endif > ) > { > n += c1 - 1; > goto matched; > } > DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT; > _______________________________________________ > linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org > To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-le...@lists.linaro.org
