Regressions on master at commit r16-1599 vs commit r16-1595 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on master at commit r16-1599 vs commit r16-1595 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps New passes:

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-16-1550-g9244ea4bf556: Failure on aarch64

I will take a look. On 20/06/25 07:16, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: > Hi Sam, > > Thanks for looking into this. > > Hi Adhemerval, > > Would you please look into how glibc should handle this? > > Thanks! > > -- > Maxim Kuvyrkov > https://www.linaro.org > >> On Jun 19, 2025, at 04:24, Sam James wro

Regressions on native/releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-11855 vs commit r14-11853 on Linux/x86_64

Regressions on releases/gcc-14 at commit r14-11855 vs commit r14-11853 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/free_race2.c -O0 output pattern test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/free_race2.c -O2 output pattern test FAIL: c-c++-common/tsan/mutexset1.c -O0 output pattern test FAIL:

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-16-1550-g9244ea4bf556: Failure on aarch64

Hi Sam, Thanks for looking into this. Hi Adhemerval, Would you please look into how glibc should handle this? Thanks! -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Jun 19, 2025, at 04:24, Sam James wrote: > > Could you file a glibc bug for this please? It needs some analysis to > see if it'