2012/9/30 Uros Bizjak :
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Vladimir Yakovlev
>> wrote:
>>> The compiler with the patch and without post_reload.patch is built and works
>>> successfully. It has the only f
Will we wait for LRA commit or is it possiple to commit to trank
vzeroupper patch now?
2012/10/2 Uros Bizjak :
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Vladimir Yakovlev
> wrote:
>>>>> The compiler with the patch and without post_reload.patch is built and
>>>>>
2010, 2011, 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This file is part of GCC.
2012/11/5 Kaz Kojima :
> Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> 2012-11-04 Vladimir Yakovlev
>> Uros Bizjak
>>
>> * mode-switching.c (create_pre_exit): Added code for
>> may
Hello,
Thanyou for investigation and fixing the problem. I'll answer on remarks later.
Regards,
Vladimir
2012/11/7 Jakub Jelinek :
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 02:11:50PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Kirill Yukhin
>> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >> OK for mainline SVN, pleas
you,
Vladimir
2012/11/7 Vladimir Yakovlev :
> Hello,
>
> Thanyou for investigation and fixing the problem. I'll answer on remarks
> later.
>
> Regards,
> Vladimir
>
> 2012/11/7 Jakub Jelinek :
>> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 02:11:50PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
-- Forwarded message --
From: Vladimir Yakovlev
Date: 2012/11/9
Subject: Re: [off-list] Re: [PATCH] Vzeroupper placement/47440
To: Uros Bizjak
Копия: "H.J. Lu" , Igor Zamyatin
I did changes that moves vzeroupper insertion after reload
2012-11-09 Vladimi
i, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Vladimir Yakovlev
>> wrote:
>>> I did changes that moves vzeroupper insertion after reload
>>>
>>> 2012-11-09 Vladimir Yakovlev
>>>
>>> * i386/i386-protos.h (ix86_avx256_optimize_mode_switching): New.
>>&
Hello,
processor_alias_table contains the same processor type for all
"corei7", "corei7-avx", "core-avx-i" and "core-avx2". At least, it has
consequence on checking x86_avx256_split_unaligned_load &
ix86_tune_mask: for all these processors it results the same. Moreover
we cannot turn new features
I did changes. Please take a look.
2012/12/29, Uros Bizjak :
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Vladimir Yakovlev
> wrote:
>
>> processor_alias_table contains the same processor type for all
>> "corei7", "corei7-avx", "core-avx-i" and "
I fixed typos and added CalangeLog.
2012-12-27 Vladimir Yakovlev :
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Vladimir Yakovlev
> wrote:
>> I did changes. Please take a look.
>>
>> 2012/12/29, Uros Bizjak :
>>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 6:26
Hello Uros,
It seems I didn't sent a patch with last changes. Sorry if so.
Vladimir
2012-12-27 Vladimir Yakovlev :
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Vladimir Yakovlev
> wrote:
>> I fixed typos and added CalangeLog.
>>
>> 2012-12-27 Vladimir Yakovlev >
&
I've fixed Changelog. Can we commit the patch to trunk now?
2012-12-27 Vladimir Yakovlev
* config/i386/i386-c.c (ix86_target_macros_internal): New case.
(ix86_target_macros_internal): Likewise.
* config/i386/i386.c (m_CORE2I7): Removed.
(m_CORE_HASWELL)
I sent the patch. Send it once more.
2013/1/11 Jakub Jelinek :
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:25:47PM +0400, Vladimir Yakovlev wrote:
>> I've fixed Changelog. Can we commit the patch to trunk now?
>>
>> 2012-12-27 Vladimir Yakovlev
>>
>> * config/i386
Kirill,
Could you commit patch?
2013-01-11 Vladimir Yakovlev
* config/i386/i386-c.c (ix86_target_macros_internal): New case.
(ix86_target_macros_internal): Likewise.
* config/i386/i386.c (m_CORE2I7): Removed.
(m_CORE_HASWELL): New macro.
(m_CORE_ALL
e
--prefix=/export/users/vbyakovl/workspaces/vzu/install-ref
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=corei7
--with-fpmath=sse
Ok for trank.
2012-08-25 Vladimir Yakovlev
* mode-switching.c (transp): Changed type
(make_preds_opaque): Added a
Thank you for testing.
> With commenting out "if (i != mode)" of the hunk
I changed type of transp and added this checking because if we reset
transp[mode], then later in the loop
FOR_EACH_BB (bb)
sbitmap_not (kill[bb->index], transp[i][bb->index]);
we set kill of the bb for that
Hello,
I reproduced the failure and found reason of it. I understood haw it
resolve and now I need small changes only - additional argument of
EMIT_MODE_SET. Is it good fo trunk?
Thank you,
Vladimir
2012-09-14 Vladimir Yakovlev
* (optimize_mode_switching): Added an argument
/configure
--prefix=/export/users/vbyakovl/workspaces/vzu/install-middle
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
2012/9/14 Vladimir Yakovlev :
> Hello,
>
> I reproduced the failure and found reason of it. I understood haw it
> resolve and now I need small changes only - additional argument of
> EM
> Looks OK to me, though I have no authority to approve it
> except SH specific part.
Is there any more comments? Can it be committed in trank?
Regards,
Vladimir
2012/9/14 Kaz Kojima :
> Vladimir Yakovlev wrote:
>> I reproduced the failure and found reason of it. I understood ha
P.S. I'll be in vacation till end of nonth.
> Vladimir Yakovlev writes:
>> I reproduced the failure and found reason of it. I understood haw it
>> resolve and now I need small changes only - additional argument of
>> EMIT_MODE_SET. Is it good fo trunk?
>
> I'm
I tried to perform vzeroupper emitting after reload as additional pass
of mode switching.
I sow one problem that I don't know haw to overcome. After
'pro_and_epilogue', there can be no
flow edge to exit block and pre_exit block is not created in this case
(see rotine create_pre_exit).
Without that
This patch fixes performance regression with -mtune=atom. Changing
atom cost removes regression in several tests of EEMBC and spec2000.
Bootstrap amd make check Ok for both with and witout -mtune-atom.
OK for trunk?
2011-09-30 Yakovlev Vladimir vladimir.b.yakov...@intel.com
* gcc/config/i
This is a ping. Change affects Atom only and was made because it
really gives better performance on this architecture. This fact
actually leads to the thought that old value is just a simple
misprint.
Please look.
Vladimir
2011/9/30 Vladimir Yakovlev :
> This patch fixes performance regress
Could anyone checkin that?
Thanks,
Vladimir
2011/10/14 Uros Bizjak :
> Hello!
>
>> This is a ping. Change affects Atom only and was made because it
>> really gives better performance on this architecture. This fact
>> actually leads to the thought that old value is just a simple
>> misprint.
>>
>
Hi Steven,
I need a separate pass because the transformation on vzeroupper
redandancy elemination must be performed when reload is completed.
I think it is possible to make it as a separate pass in ix86-reorg if
the phase works after reload.
Thaks,
Vladimir
2011/7/19 Steven Bosscher :
>>
Hi Uros,
Thank you for such a detailed explanation. I'll study it.
Regards,
Vladimir
2011/7/20 Uros Bizjak :
> Hello!
>
>> > ? ? ? ?* a/gcc/gcse.c (alloc_gcse_mem): Added code to run in PRE2.
>>
>> And this is necessary because...???
>>
>> Why not just make it a separate pass in ix86-reorg that
26 matches
Mail list logo
