[Patch-86512]: Subnormal float support in armv7(with -msoft-float) for intrinsics

Hi Nagy/Ramana, Please help us to review the attached patch and do let me know your comments . No regress in the gcc.target suite for arm target. Thank you ~Umesh On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Umesh Kalappa wrote: > Will do, thanks. > Thanks > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018, 3:

Re: [Patch-86512]: Subnormal float support in armv7(with -msoft-float) for intrinsics

Reminder !!! ~Umesh On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Umesh Kalappa wrote: > Hi Nagy/Ramana, > > Please help us to review the attached patch and do let me know your comments . > > No regress in the gcc.target suite for arm target. > > Thank you > ~Umesh > > O

Re: [Patch-86512]: Subnormal float support in armv7(with -msoft-float) for intrinsics

Thank you all for your comments . Wilco, We tried some of the normalisation numbers and the fix works and please could you help us with the input ,where if you see that fix breaks down. Thank you again ~Umesh On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 7:07 PM Wilco Dijkstra wrote: > Hi Umesh, > > Looking at your p

Re: [Patch-86512]: Subnormal float support in armv7(with -msoft-float) for intrinsics

Dijkstra wrote: > Umesh Kalappa wrote: > >> We tried some of the normalisation numbers and the fix works and please >> could you help us with the input ,where if you see that fix breaks down. > > Well try any set of inputs which require normalisation. You'll find the

Re: [Patch-86512]: Subnormal float support in armv7(with -msoft-float) for intrinsics

> R. > > On 23/07/18 08:46, Umesh Kalappa wrote: >> Thank you Wilco for the inputs and we agree that the fix break down >> for the case. >> >> Meanwhile ,attached patch will take care the inputs and we are testing >> the patch vigorously ,would you r

Re: [Patch-86512]: Subnormal float support in armv7(with -msoft-float) for intrinsics

Umesh Kalappa + + PR libgcc/86512 + * config/arm/ieee754-df.S :Don't normalise the denormal result. + * config/arm/ieee754-sf.S:Likewise. + + +++ gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog (working copy) @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2018-07-18 Umesh Kalappa + + PR libgcc/86512 + * gcc.targe

Re: [Patch-86512]: Subnormal float support in armv7(with -msoft-float) for intrinsics

Hi, Any more suggestions or comments on the patch ? Thank you ~Umesh On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, 2:08 PM Umesh Kalappa wrote: > Thank you All for the suggestions and we tried runing the GCC > testsuite and found that no regression with the fix and also ran the > our regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84762

Hi All, Please find the attached patch for the subjected issue . Do please let me know your thoughts and comments on the same . Thank you ~Umesh pr84762.patch Description: Binary data

Re: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84762

Thank you Jakub for the information. Will make a note of it. Umesh On Tue, Dec 11, 2018, 17:58 Jakub Jelinek On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 05:30:48PM +0530, Umesh Kalappa wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Please find the attached patch for the subjected issue . > > > > Do pl

Re: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84762

Thank you Segher, will work on your suggestions. Umesh On Tue, Dec 11, 2018, 19:23 Segher Boessenkool Hi Umesh, > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 05:30:48PM +0530, Umesh Kalappa wrote: > > Please find the attached patch for the subjected issue . > > > > Do please let m

Bug 52869 - [DR 1207] "this" not being allowed in noexcept clauses

Hi All, the following patch fix the subjected issue Index: gcc/cp/parser.c === --- gcc/cp/parser.c (revision 266026) +++ gcc/cp/parser.c (working copy) @@ -24615,6 +24615,8 @@ { tree expr; cp_lexer_consume_

Re: Bug 52869 - [DR 1207] "this" not being allowed in noexcept clauses

t know for any regressions . Meanwhile ,Please let us know your thoughts on the patch. Thank you ~Umesh On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 2:55 AM Jason Merrill wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:40 AM Marek Polacek wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 11:49:55AM +0530, Umesh Kalap

Re: Bug 52869 - [DR 1207] "this" not being allowed in noexcept clauses

>>We are runing the make check-gcc(x86_64) and will let know for any >>regressions . No regress found . ~Umesh On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 5:18 PM Umesh Kalappa wrote: > > Thank you Jason and Marek for the suggestions . > > Attached patch(pr86512.patch) along the Changel

Re: Bug 52869 - [DR 1207] "this" not being allowed in noexcept clauses

My bad Marek and thank you for pointing that out. Please find the attached correct one (pr52869.patch) . ~Umesh pr52869.patch Description: Binary data

Re: Bug 52869 - [DR 1207] "this" not being allowed in noexcept clauses

> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 09:55:39PM +0530, Umesh Kalappa wrote: > > My bad Marek and thank you for pointing that out. > > > > Please find the attached correct one (pr52869.patch) . > > Index: gcc/cp/ChangeLog > ===

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87626

Hi All, The attached patch (pr85667.patch) fixes the subjected issue . we tested on x86_64(linux and windows both) and no regress found . ok to commit ? Thank you ~Umesh pr85667.patch Description: Binary data

Re: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85667

Edited the subjected for the proper PR no. ~Umesh On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:32 PM Umesh Kalappa wrote: > > Hi All, > > The attached patch (pr85667.patch) fixes the subjected issue . > we tested on x86_64(linux and windows both) and no regress found . > > ok to commit ? > > Thank you > ~Umesh

Re: Bug 52869 - [DR 1207] "this" not being allowed in noexcept clauses

Thank you Marek,Appreciate your valuable feedback on the patch . Attached the latest ,please do let us know your thoughts. ~Umesh On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 9:26 PM Marek Polacek wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 02:26:24PM +0530, Umesh Kalappa wrote: > > Thank you Marek fo

Re: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87626

Thank you Richard, Made the required changes ,ok to commit ? Thank you ~Umesh On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 4:02 PM Richard Biener wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 10:02 AM Umesh Kalappa > wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > The attached patch (pr85667.patch) fixes th

Re: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87626

My bad , attached the same now . ~Umesh On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 2:38 PM Richard Biener wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 9:07 AM Umesh Kalappa > wrote: > > > > Thank you Richard, > > > > Made the required changes ,ok to commit ? > > Can you attach th

Re: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87626

; On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 4:57 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 04:21:25PM +0530, Umesh Kalappa wrote: >> > My bad , >> > attached the same now . >> >> +2018-11-15 Lokesh Janghel >> >> Two spaces before < instead of

Re: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87626

Thank you for the inputs and please find the attachment for the update patch. Do please let us know your comments on the same ~Umesh On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 3:03 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 04:08:29PM +0530, Lokesh Janghel wrote: > diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeL

Re: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87626

Hi Jakub and All, We don't have the commit access ,can someone please commit for us ? ~Umesh On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 18:37 Jakub Jelinek On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 06:06:41PM +0530, Umesh Kalappa wrote: > > Thank you for the inputs and please find the attachment for the update > p

Re: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54589

you ~Umesh On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 3:56 PM Umesh Kalappa wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > for the subjected issue , we found few suggestions to handle the issue like > > 1. be more conservative(target specific) and defining the peephole in > the md file to handle the patterns like a

Re: [Patch]Bug 89057 - [8/9/10 Regression] AArch64 ld3 st4 less optimized

>>Before getting started with reviewing the patch , the first question is whether you have a copyright assignment on file or does your employer have one on record with the FSF ? Ramana, We asked for copyright assignment form ,with details asked by copyright-cl...@fsf.org(craig) @ ass...@gnu.org.

RE: [EXTERNAL]Re: [PATCH] RISCV :Added MIPS P8700 Subtarget.

Thank you @Kito Cheng for early suggestions ,we will break down the patch like suggested and address the below comments . ~U -Original Message- From: Kito Cheng Sent: 11 April 2025 12:37 To: Umesh Kalappa Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; kito.ch...@sifive.com; Jesse Huang ; pal

[PATCH]RISCV :Added MIPS P8700 Subtarget

This is the first patch from the two-patch series, where configured gcc for P8700 micro architecture in the first patch and Tested with dejagnu riscv.exp tests for --mtune=mips-p8700. P8700 is a high-performance processor from MIPS by extending RISCV. The following changes enable P8700 proces

[PATCH] RISCV :Added MIPS P8700 Subtarget.

/riscv/mips-insn.md create mode 100644 gcc/config/riscv/mips-p8700.md create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/mipscondmov.c diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index 1326c67563a..d2642390b2a 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,24 @@ +2025-04-09 Umesh Kalappa

RE: [EXTERNAL]Re: [PATCH]RISCV :Added MIPS P8700 Subtarget

s more closely. If you have questions >> about how the compiler uses them to make decisions, just ask Sure ,and lets us tune the same and reach out here for future questions . ~U -Original Message- From: Jeff Law Sent: 18 April 2025 22:42 To: Umesh Kalappa ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.