On 20 May 2015 at 18:18, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> On 20 May 2015 at 17:01, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 20 May 2015 at 16:17, Prathamesh Kulka
On 20 May 2015 at 17:39, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On 20 May 2015 at 17:01, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>
>>> On 20 May 2015 at 16:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> > Th
e/gcc.dg/pr49551.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..204f06d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr49551.c
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O -fdata-sections" } */
+
+int x = 1;
+int x;
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {comm[\t ]+x} } } */
2015-05-3
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 3:06 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>
>>> Is this version okay ?
>>> [gcc/c]
>>> * c-decl.c (warn_cxx_compat_finish_str
Since cxx_dialect is not cxx98 and ok is false, it returns false.
The attached patch fixes the ICE, by setting "ok = true" if
warn_narrowing is enabled thereby returning "true" to
convert_like_real().
Booststrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with no regressions.
OK
On 1 May 2015 at 01:12, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On 04/30/2015 08:45 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>>
>> .. also, your patch doesn't seem to fix the case of -w instead of
That could be fixed as follows:
if (!warn_narrowing || inhibit_warnings)
ok = true;
else
// pedwarn
>> -Wno-narrowin
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 3:06 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> Is this version okay ?
>> [gcc/c]
>> * c-decl.c (warn_cxx_compat_finish_struct): New parameters code,
>> record_loc.
>> Warn for empty
for trunk if testing passes ?
Thank you,
Prathamesh
2015-06-19 Prathamesh Kulkarni
PR c/44257
* c-typeck.c (build_indirect_ref): Add check !in_typeof before
reporting incomplete type error.
* gcc.dg/pr44257: New test-case.
diff --git a/gcc/c/c-typeck.c b/gcc/c/c-typeck.c
not trip on that. */
if ((cfun->curr_properties & PROP_cfg)
- && !from_ipa_pass)
+ && !from_ipa_pass
+ && cfun->cfg)
verify_flow_info ();
if (current_loops
&& loops_state_sati
using config-list.mk.
I left includes in cfgloop.h commented with #if 0 ... #endif.
OK for trunk ?
Thank you,
Prathamesh
2015-07-05 Prathamesh Kulkarni
* loop-invariant.h: New header file.
* loop-init.h: Likewise.
* loop-doloop.h: Likewise.
* cfgloopanal.h
Hi,
The attached patch moves pattern a * (1 << b) -> a << b.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.
OK for trunk if testing passes ?
Thank you,
Prathamesh
2015-07-06 Prathamesh Kulkarni
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc): Remove pattern a * 1
On 6 July 2015 at 12:00, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Passing -dx causes segmentation fault:
>> Test case: void f(void) {}
>>
>> ./test.c: In function 'f':
>> ../tes
On 14 January 2015 at 12:14, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> On 14 January 2015 at 17:31, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 14 January 2015 at 11:16, Pr
On 15 January 2015 at 14:14, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>> I tried compiling an empty plugin that just included gcc-plugin.h and
>> plugin-version.h and found that these header files were included from
>> gcc-plugin.h but not in the list of heade
On 16 January 2015 at 00:00, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>
>> >>
>> >> 2015-01-14 Steve Ellcey
>> >>
>> >> * Makefile.in (PLUGIN_HEADERS): Add dominance.h, cfg.h, cfgrtl.h,
>> >> cfganal.h, cfgbuild.h, cfgcleanup.h, lcm.h, builtins.def,
>> >> chkp-builtins.def, and pass-instance
r219655 added two files explow.h, dojump.h with duplicated contents,
silly mistake from my side. The attached patch removes duplicate
contents. Committed (r219680) as obvious.
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2015-01-15 Prathamesh Kulkarni
* explow.h: Remove duplicate contents.
* dojump.h
On 12 January 2015 at 08:46, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jan 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> On 8 January 2015 at 17:52, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > On Sun, 21 Dec 2014, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >> I removed
ed similar to a doc-fix ?
OK to commit ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2015-01-20 Prathamesh Kulkarni
* config/tilegx/mul-tables.c: Move symtab.h include after coretypes.h
include.
* config/tilepro/mul-tables.c: Add includes hashtab.h, hash-set.h,
vec.h,
machmode.h, tm.h, hard
ess.
Assuming it goes fine, OK to commit ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
>
> --
> Eric Botcazou
2015-01-22 Prathamesh Kulkarni
* emit-rtl.h (store_bit_field): Move prototype to expmed.h.
(extract_bit_field): Likewise.
(extract_low_bits): Likewise.
(expand_mult): Like
On 31 January 2015 at 15:30, Chen Gang S wrote:
> On 1/31/15 16:53, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Chen Gang S writes:
>>
>>> * gthr-single.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Use braces
>>> instead of macro's empty body to avoid xgcc warnings.
The ChangeLog entry should be fixed to reflect it
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>> Currently this is accepted:
>> (for plus (mult div)
>> ...)
>> which is incorrect. This patch puts more error-checks on the user-defi
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>> I suppose we should reject conditional convert and commutative ops in
>> result operand ? since it would create 1-n mapping from match ->
>> resu
genmatch segfaults if user-defined operator is not specified.
eg:
(for (oper1 oper2...)
pattern)
* genmatch.c
(parser::parse_for): Call peek instead of peek_ident.
Thanks,
Prathamesh
Index: genmatch.c
===
--- genmatch.c (revisio
(had sent it earlier by private mail).
The attached patch supports operator-list and it's use in for.
For now, operator-list is rejected in expression.
This patch also allows user-defined operator to be used as operator-list
(user-defined ops are really temporary or "scoped" operator-lists).
(for
Hi,
This patch adds support for operator-lists to be used in expression.
I reuse operator-list as the iterator. This is not really valid since
user-defined operator-lists cannot be iterator in 'for', but it was
convenient to reuse operator-list as a 'for' iterator
and lower_for doesn't care abou
Hi,
For the following test-case:
struct A {};
clang -fsyntax-only -Wc++-compat gives following warning and gcc does not:
empty-struct.c:1:1: warning: empty struct has size 0 in C, size 1 in
C++ [-Wc++-compat]
struct F {};
This patch adds the above warning to the C FE.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unkn
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 03:24:48AM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> * gcc/c/c-decl.c
>> (warn_cxx_compat_finish_struct): Add new parameter of type location_t.
>> Warn for empty struct.
>> (
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:45:46AM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> Index: gcc/c/c-decl.c
>> ===
>> --- gcc/c/c-decl.c(revision 217287)
>> +++
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:27:21PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> I tried the following:
>> struct A { struct B {}; int x; } /* { dg-warning "empty struct has
>> size 0 in C" } */
>>
Hi,
The attached patch fixes a typo in cse_dump_path, which I came across
while debugging another issue. OK to commit ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2019-05-22 Prathamesh Kulkarni
* cse.c (cse_dump_path): s/dump_file/f.
diff --git a/gcc/cse.c b/gcc/cse.c
index 6c9cda16a98..35840a6d5ca 100644
+test on patch in qemu.
Does the patch look OK ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2019-05-27 Prathamesh Kulkarni
Richard Sandiford
* vector-builder.h (vector_builder::count_dups): New method.
* config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h (aarch64_expand_sve_vector_init):
De
On Wed, 29 May 2019 at 18:10, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > Hi,
> > The attached patch tries to improve initialization for fixed-length
> > SVE vector and it's algorithm is described in comments for
> > aarch64_sve_expand_vector_
On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 15:10, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/init_1.c
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/init_1.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..cbfeff4a59c
&
On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 21:19, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 15:10, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 14:53, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 21:19, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> > On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 15:10, Richard Sandiford
&g
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 16:25, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> >> > b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> >> > index 3bd6e815715..0ff0d8fb757 100644
> >
On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 16:54, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Szabolcs Nagy writes:
> > On 03/06/2019 08:26, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/init_8.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> >> +/* { dg-do assemble { target aarch64_
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 18:26, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 at 16:54, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Szabolcs Nagy writes:
> >> > On 03/06/2019 08:26, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >&g
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 22:47, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > 2019-06-07 Prathamesh Kulkarni
> >
> > * gcc.target/aarch64/sve/init_1.c: Remove options
> > -O2 -fno-schedule-insns and instead pass -O.
> &g
Hi,
The attached patch tries to fix PR88833.
For the following test-case:
subroutine foo(x)
real :: x(100)
x = x + 10
end subroutine foo
Assembly with -O3 -march=armv8.2-a+sve:
foo_:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
mov w2, 100
mov w3, w2
mov x1, 0
wh
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 14:59, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > diff --git a/gcc/fwprop.c b/gcc/fwprop.c
> > index 45703fe5f01..93a1a10c9a6 100644
> > --- a/gcc/fwprop.c
> > +++ b/gcc/fwprop.c
> > @@ -547,6 +547,54 @@ propagate_rtx_
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 at 11:56, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 18:15, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 13:45, Kyrill Tkachov
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Prathamesh
> > >
> > > On 7/10/
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 15:34, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 at 11:56, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 18:15, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 13:45, Kyrill Tkacho
Hi,
The attached patch tries to fix PR86753.
For following test:
void
f1 (int *restrict x, int *restrict y, int *restrict z)
{
for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i)
x[i] = y[i] ? z[i] : 10;
}
vect dump shows:
vect_cst__42 = { 0, ... };
vect_cst__48 = { 0, ... };
vect__4.7_41 = .MASK_LOAD (ve
On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 11:22, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 15:34, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 at 11:56, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 18:15, Prathamesh Kulkarni
Hi,
The attached patch is a fix for PR88839 ported from sve-acle-branch.
OK to commit to trunk ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2019-08-21 Prathamesh Kulkarni
Richard Sandiford
PR target/88839
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_evpc_sel): New function
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 15:18, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > Hi,
> > The attached patch is a fix for PR88839 ported from sve-acle-branch.
> > OK to commit to trunk ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Prathamesh
> >
> > 2
On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 01:50, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 6:49 PM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:06 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> >> wrote:
> >> >
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 22:14, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 02:11:25PM +0100, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 11:22, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 15:34, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> >
ailure.
OK to commit ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2019-08-22 Prathamesh Kulkarni
* aarch64-sve.md (vcond_mask): Add "@".
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve.md
b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve.md
index ac65e691d73..f58353e9c6d 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve.md
+++ b/gcc
On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 16:44, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:24 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 01:50, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Richard Biener writes:
> > > > On W
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 18:15, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 16:44, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:24 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> >> wrote:
> >> &g
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 19:43, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 18:15, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> > On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 16:44, Richard Biener
>
On Mon, 26 Aug 2019 at 14:48, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 11:13 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 at 19:43, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 17:29, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:58 AM Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >> ifcvt produces:
> >>
> >>[local count: 1063004407]:
> >> # i_34 = PHI
> >> # ivtmp_5 = PHI
> >> _1 = (long unsigned int) i_34;
> >>
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 21:14, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard should have the final say, but some comments...
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
> > index 1e2dfe5d22d..862206b3256 100644
> > --- a/g
+test on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. (Also IIRC, Wall
triggered several instances of the warning with allmodconfig kernel
build last time).
Is the patch OK to commit ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2019-08-29 Prathamesh Kulkarni
* doc/invoke.texi: Document -Wenum-conversion.
* c-family/c.opt
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 16:15, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:02 AM Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
> >
> > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > > On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 21:14, Richard Sandiford
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> >
On Tue, 9 May 2017 at 18:59, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 06:55:12PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > ping https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg00135.html
>
> The libgomp patch is ok provided the warning is added.
> Though, should it be in -
On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 01:22, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 8/28/19 8:55 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > Hi,
> > This is a rebased patch on trunk for PR78736. The last time, it got
> > stuck, because of warning issues with libgfortran, for which I filed
> > PR91593. The
On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 14:29, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Sorry for the slow reply.
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 16:15, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:02 AM Richard Sandiford
> >>
On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 16:45, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > With patch, the only following FAIL remains for aarch64-sve.exp:
> > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/cond_unary_2.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve
> > scan-assembler-times \\tmovprfx\\t 6
&
On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 00:05, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 22:14, James Greenhalgh
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 02:11:25PM +0100, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 11:22, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > >
On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 22:06, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 16:45, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
> >
> > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > > With patch, the only following FAIL remains for aarch64-sve.exp:
> > > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 at 19:05, Matthew Malcomson
wrote:
>
> Resending because I forgot to avoid the disclaimer and hence my email
> didn't go to the gcc-patches list.
>
>
>
> On 09/09/19 21:55, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 22:06, Prathamesh K
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 11:50, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
>
> While code hoisting generally improves codesize, it can affect performance
> negatively. Benchmarking shows it doesn't help SPEC and negatively affects
> embedded benchmarks, so only enable code hoisting with -Os on Arm.
>
> Bootstrap OK, OK
On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 09:36, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 16:45, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
> >
> > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > > With patch, the only following FAIL remains for aarch64-sve.exp:
> > > FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 at 01:46, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 7:18 PM Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> >
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > > The issue with the bugzilla is that it lacked appropriate testcase(s) and
> > > thus
> > > it is now a mess. There are clear testcases (maybe not in the be
On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 at 22:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 at 01:46, Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 7:18 PM Wilco Dijkstra
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Richard,
> > >
> > > > Th
Hi,
For PR91532, the dead store is trivially deleted if we place dse pass
between ifcvt and vect. Would it be OK to add another instance of dse there ?
Or should we add an ad-hoc "basic-block dse" sub-pass to ifcvt that
will clean up the dead store ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
which
stalled the patch).
Bootstrap+tested on arm-linux-gnueabihf.
Cross-tested on arm*-*-* variants.
OK for trunk ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2018-10-26 Prathamesh Kulkarni
* config/arm/neon.md (div3): New pattern.
testsuite/
* gcc.target/arm/neon-vect-div-1.c: New
> 0
which resolves the regression.
Bootstrapped+tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Cross-testing on arm and aarch64 variants in progress.
OK for trunk if passes ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2018-11-02 Prathamesh Kulkarni
* match.pd (erfc(x) -> 1 - erf(x)): New pattern.
(1 - e
On Fri, 26 Oct 2018 at 10:34, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> This is a rebased version of patch that adds a pattern to neon.md for
> implementing division with multiplication by reciprocal using
> vrecpe/vrecps with -funsafe-math-optimizations excluding -Os.
> The newly ad
On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 at 19:08, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
> > This is a rebased version of patch that adds a pattern to neon.md for
> > implementing division with multiplication by reciprocal using
> > vrecpe/vrecps with -funsafe-math-optimizat
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 15:10, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 10:37 AM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > This patch adds two transforms to match.pd to CSE erf/erfc pair.
> > erfc(x) is canonicalized to 1 - erf(x) and is the
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 18:14, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 1:11 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 15:10, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 10:37 AM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> &g
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 19:22, Ramana Radhakrishnan
wrote:
>
> On 26/10/2018 06:04, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > Hi,
> > This is a rebased version of patch that adds a pattern to neon.md for
> > implementing division with multiplication by reciprocal using
> > vr
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 at 16:04, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:11 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 18:14, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 1:11 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> &
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 19:51, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > @@ -1415,6 +1460,19 @@ forward_propagate_into (df_ref use)
> >if (!def_set)
> > return false;
> >
> > + if (reg_prop_only
> > + && !REG_P
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 22:02, Martin Jambor wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> in August 2016 Prathamesh implemented inter-procedural propagation of
> known non-zero bits on integers. In August that same year he then also
> added the ability to track it for pointer, replacing separate alignment
> tracking.
>
> H
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 21:41, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 19:51, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
> >
> > Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > > @@ -1415,6 +1460,19 @@ forward_propagate_into (df_ref use)
> > >if (!def_set)
>
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 20:05, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 21:41, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 19:51, Richard Sandiford
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> &g
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 16:05, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 20:05, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 21:41, Prathamesh Kulkar
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 23:45, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 16:05, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> > On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 20:05, Richard Sandiford
&g
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 16:59, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Thanks for fixing this.
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > diff --git a/gcc/simplify-rtx.c b/gcc/simplify-rtx.c
> > index 89a46a933fa..79bd0cfbd28 100644
> > --- a/gcc/simplify-rtx.c
> > +++ b/gcc/si
On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 18:22, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 16:59, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks for fixing this.
> >>
> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> >
On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 17:06, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 18:22, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> >> > On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 16:59, Richard Sandiford
>
OK to commit ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2019-07-09 Prathamesh Kulkarni
PR target/90723
* recog.h (volatile_ok_temp): New class.
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_emit_sve_pred_move): Set
volatile_ok temporarily to true using volatile_ok_temp.
*
dval) satisfies aarch64_plus_operand
predicate and if not, forces it to be in register, which resolves ICE.
Does it look OK ?
Bootstrap+testing in progress on aarch64-linux-gnu.
PS: The issue has nothing to do with SVE, which I incorrectly
mentioned in bug report.
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2019-07-10 Prat
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 01:48, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > Hi,
> > For following test-case:
> >
> > typedef double v4df __attribute__ ((vector_size (32)));
> > void foo(v4df);
> >
> > int
> > main ()
> &
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 13:39, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > @@ -186,6 +186,23 @@ skip_alternative (const char *p)
> > /* Nonzero means volatile operands are recognized. */
> > extern int volatile_ok;
> >
> > +/* RAII class
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 16:54, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> For following test-case,
> static long long AL[24];
>
> int
> check_ok (void)
> {
> return (__sync_bool_compare_and_swap (AL+1, 0x20003ll, 0x1234567890ll));
> }
>
> Compiling with -O2 -mar
Hi,
The attached patch tries to fix PR91166.
Does it look OK ?
Bootstrap+test in progress on aarch64-linux-gnu and x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2019-07-17 Prathamesh Kulkarni
PR middle-end/91166
* match.pd (vec_perm_expr(v, v, mask) -> v): New patt
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 13:45, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
>
> Hi Prathamesh
>
> On 7/10/19 12:24 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > Hi,
> > For following test-case,
> > static long long AL[24];
> >
> > int
> > check_ok (void)
> > {
> >
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 18:12, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Not really my area, but FWIW...
>
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
> > Hi,
> > The attached patch tries to fix PR91166.
> > Does it look OK ?
> > Bootstrap+test in progress on aarch64-linux-g
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 16:36, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 18:12, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Not really my area, but FWIW...
> > >
> > > Prathamesh
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 17:48, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 16:36, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > >
> > >
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 18:15, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 13:45, Kyrill Tkachov
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Prathamesh
> >
> > On 7/10/19 12:24 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > For following test-case,
> >
Hi,
I committed attached patch, which fixes PR88839 to sve-acle-branch
after approval from Richard Sandiford offline.
Thanks,
Prathamesh
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
index ec60e972f5f..f8d5270b982 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
+++ b/gcc/confi
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 02:56, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 1/30/19 7:10 AM, Bárbara de Castro Fernandes wrote:
> > This patch simplifies the function tanh (x) * cosh (x) -> sinh (x).
> > This rule is derived from the relationship between hyperbolic
> > functions.
> >
> > I ran the tests and gfortran.dg/
201 - 300 of 1038 matches
Mail list logo
