[PATCH] 2014-08-29 Honggyu Kim

Honggyu Kim + + * doc/generic.texi: Fix typo. + 2014-08-29 David Malcolm PR bootstrap/62300 diff --git a/gcc/doc/generic.texi b/gcc/doc/generic.texi index 4476f28..a598500 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/generic.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/generic.texi @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ seems inelegant. @node

[PATCH] doc/generic.texi: Fix typo

This fixes some typo errors in the gcc internal document. 2014-08-29 Honggyu Kim * doc/generic.texi: Fix typo. --- gcc/ChangeLog|4 gcc/doc/generic.texi |2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index

RE: [PATCH] doc/generic.texi: Fix typo

On 9/1/2014 7:11 AM, Robert Dewar wrote: > Seems a shame that anyone should need an explanation, but oh well :-) Sorry about that. I should have thought about it twice :) > P.S. my favorite instance of this kind of documentation is an early IBM > Fortran manual, which says that you should put exa

RE: [PATCH] doc/generic.texi: Fix typo

On 9/1/2014 5:50 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Since this now came up for the second time this year, I went ahead and > applied the patch below. Thanks for the comment :) Honggyu

[PATCH][ARM] New testcase to check parameter passing bug

--git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index 5302dbd..9acd12a 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2015-03-13 Honggyu Kim + + PR target/65235 + * gcc.target/arm/pr65358.c: New test for sibcall argument passing bug. + 2015

RE: [PATCH][ARM] New testcase to check parameter passing bug

33 + 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr65358.c diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index 5302dbd..5dcf2cf 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2015-03-16 Ho

[PATCH v2] New testcase to check parameter passing bug

c diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index 77d24a1..218f908 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2015-03-19 Honggyu Kim + + * gcc.dg/pr65358.c: New test. + 2015-03-18 Paolo Carlini PR c++/59816 diff --git a/g

Re: [PATCH v2] New testcase to check parameter passing bug

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:40:44AM +0900, Honggyu Kim wrote: > --- > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog|4 > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr65358.c | 33 + > 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr65358.c &g

Re: [PATCH][expr.c] PR 65358 Avoid clobbering partial argument during sibcall

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 02:39:11PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > Hi all, > > This patch fixes PR 65358. For details look at the excellent write-up > by Honggyu in bugzilla. The problem is that we're trying to pass a struct > partially on the stack and partially in regs during a tail-call optimisa

Re: [PATCH v2] New testcase to check parameter passing bug

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:05:37PM -, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] > > Sent: 25 March 2015 12:27 > > To: Honggyu Kim; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > > Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov; seg...@kernel.

[PATCH] Make maybe_cast_to_ptrmode function as static

Hi, This patch makes maybe_cast_to_ptrmode function in asan.c as static because the function is not called outside of the file. Is it okay for trunk? Honggyu 2015-03-30 Honggyu Kim * asan.c (maybe_cast_to_ptrmode): Make static. --- gcc/asan.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion

[PATCH] BFD: Fix unmatched #ifndef and #endif

bfd/bfd-in.h has '#ifndef __BFD_H_SEEN__' statement at the beginning of the header file but do not have '#endif' at the end. * bfd/bfd-in.h: Add #endif statment --- bfd/bfd-in.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/bfd/bfd-in.h b/bfd/bfd-in.h index 196bd70..ba36ee1 100644

Re: [PATCH] BFD: Fix unmatched #ifndef and #endif

On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 10:26:39AM +0900, Honggyu Kim wrote: > bfd/bfd-in.h has '#ifndef __BFD_H_SEEN__' statement at the beginning of > the header file but do not have '#endif' at the end. > > * bfd/bfd-in.h: Add #endif statment I just found my mistake.