On 9/1/2014 7:11 AM, Robert Dewar wrote:

> Seems a shame that anyone should need an explanation, but oh well :-)
Sorry about that. I should have thought about it twice :)

> P.S. my favorite instance of this kind of documentation is an early IBM
> Fortran manual, which says that you should put exactly the character you
> want to see come out on the printer [in some context], "e.g. an I for an I
> and a 2 for a 2." :-)
Maybe I should learn something for that document :)

Thanks,
 
Honggyu

Reply via email to