On 9/1/2014 7:11 AM, Robert Dewar wrote: > Seems a shame that anyone should need an explanation, but oh well :-) Sorry about that. I should have thought about it twice :)
> P.S. my favorite instance of this kind of documentation is an early IBM > Fortran manual, which says that you should put exactly the character you > want to see come out on the printer [in some context], "e.g. an I for an I > and a 2 for a 2." :-) Maybe I should learn something for that document :) Thanks, Honggyu